|
Post by fjrogers on Jan 14, 2016 12:44:36 GMT 9.5
There might well be frontiers on the moon, behind which there could be terrestrial and extraterrestrial occupants.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 26, 2016 8:00:43 GMT 9.5
Here is an image showing both the near side and far side of the Moon. The near side has lots of very wide very shallow craters/seas while the far side has smaller craters. So the side sheltered by the Earth was hit by something(s) that made lots of very wide shallow craters while the side exposed to the rest of the solar system has mostly much smaller but still too shallow craters. So what makes wide shallow craters? Nuclear weapons? Beam weapons? ... I wonder if beam weapons would evaporate more volatile components "One of the key differences, that's been known since the Apollo sample return, is that the Moon is much more depleted in so-called volatile elements - those that vaporise easily as you heat up material," said Dr Robin Canup, the new study's lead author, from the Southwest Research Institute in Colorado, US. "And the origin of this depletion has been essentially unknown." www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-34765789
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Mar 26, 2016 12:47:19 GMT 9.5
> So what makes wide shallow craters? Nuclear weapons? Beam weapons?
We'd have to look back to the distant past to answer some of the questions arising from this issue. But, do we have precise, accurate answers to these questions, or do we have to resort to conjecture and assumptions?
How can we obtain answers to these mysteries? Akashic records perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 26, 2016 15:58:09 GMT 9.5
>How can we obtain answers to these mysteries?
Here is an experiment:
Look at that enormous "sea" that goes from about 7 o'clock to 11 o'clock on this side of the Moon.
Now visualise a volcano coming close to that sea.
Visualise a beam weapon coming close.
Visualise a nuclear weapon coming close
Visualise another planetoid coming close
Try an enormous space craft.
What do you see?
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Mar 26, 2016 19:46:02 GMT 9.5
> Here is an experiment:
Look at that enormous "sea" that goes from about 7 o'clock to 11 o'clock on this side of the Moon.
Now visualise a volcano coming close to that sea.
Visualise a beam weapon coming close.
Visualise a nuclear weapon coming close
Visualise another planetoid coming close
Try an enormous space craft.
What do you see?
I see what you mean. You see an enormous crater.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 26, 2016 20:09:54 GMT 9.5
>I see what you mean. You see an enormous crater.
So what happens when you bring the various possible causes to the crater?
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Mar 27, 2016 16:05:22 GMT 9.5
I suppose the result could be explosive activity, underground activity and high impact.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 28, 2016 6:40:00 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Mar 28, 2016 10:19:54 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 23, 2016 7:49:31 GMT 9.5
This is Phobos, a moon of Mars. The long striations are called stress fractures but this seems rather hopeful - especially where they turn around in a tight turning circle and go back the other way. They look more like furrows. Except that they are actually formed by lots of small, nearly identical craters. As if someone has been practicing with a beam weapon.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on May 23, 2016 15:33:26 GMT 9.5
> This is Phobos, a moon of Mars.
It looks like Phobos might have had a fairly rough adolescent patch.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jun 6, 2016 9:34:48 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jun 6, 2016 9:40:18 GMT 9.5
And more of the Moon tothemoon.ser.asu.edu/data_a/AS17/raw/AS17-160-23947.tifNote the perfect circular structure at 3 o'clock and the bright circular formation at 12 o'clock. Flowing from the circular formation are parallel lines looking like the remains of buildings along roads. And at 1 o'clock, what on Earth would be called a runway. If you make the image full screen, there are lots of right angles to be found.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Jun 6, 2016 19:42:14 GMT 9.5
The moon has obviously been occupied at various times in history. The more we look into it the more we have to learn.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Jun 10, 2016 16:42:30 GMT 9.5
That almost looks like a half closed eye.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 6, 2016 9:36:40 GMT 9.5
Here is Comet 67P. Note the 3 flows (of sediment?) from 10 o'clock to 12 o'clock into the central area and from there through a gap in a crater wall to half way across the crater floor". This presumably means a liquid flowed. Small erosion gullies can be seen. So how did a small comet have enough gravity to cause a flow quite similar to those seen on Earth? Where did the liquid come from? Surely the substantial absence of atmosphere (because of very low gravity) would allow any liquid to evaporate very quickly. Thus the questions arise: - Was 67P broken off from a much larger body? - Were the flows caused by applied liquid or applied heat? - How did the dumbbell shape of this comet occur? There are many other anomalies in this comet including this circular shaft: lightsinthedark.com/2015/01/22/been-waiting-for-hi-res-osiris-images-of-rosettas-comet-here-they-are/
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Sept 6, 2016 14:59:03 GMT 9.5
It's fairly mysterious. 67P could have broken off from another body as a result of some kind of collision which could have coincidentally caused the dumbbell shape. The sediment flows are not easy to explain. Heat may be more likely than liquid.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 9, 2016 14:00:03 GMT 9.5
>"So you can create virtual space-times just as you can create virtual particles."
The Montauk and other accounts indicate that time manipulation is practiced by several groups.
And human spirits seem to exist on multiple time paths simultaneously.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Sept 9, 2016 16:20:58 GMT 9.5
> And human spirits seem to exist on multiple time paths simultaneously.
I think this may well be true. I think the subtle bodies of humans exist and undertake activities on many levels and time paths.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 29, 2017 15:25:18 GMT 9.5
|
|