|
Post by paul on Dec 31, 2010 10:31:33 GMT 9.5
Moon anomalies are a dime a dozen these days - and we are even allowed to see colour photos of the Moon. I rather liked this black and white photo. See all the parallel lines between 10 & 11 o'clock close to the centre. If you zoom in your browser you will see a perfectly straight shadow of a ridge line running vertically in the image - just at the left end of the parallel lines. The ridge line looks for all the world like a building. I can even seen the triangular cross-section of the roof. To the right of the building is a huge compound with straight walls, each joining in a clear right angle Look for trails and roads nearby and below www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/41Group_Lunar_FYEO/02files/FYEO_Lunar_07.html
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Dec 31, 2010 12:59:57 GMT 9.5
get google earth (its 100% free) and have a closer look.. google earth also does mars and some spectacular deep space pics..
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Jan 11, 2011 14:13:31 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jan 11, 2011 15:54:35 GMT 9.5
I can't quite see how the shadows work on those objects
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Jan 17, 2011 9:50:24 GMT 9.5
Prob fakes.. good point.
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Jan 17, 2011 14:21:18 GMT 9.5
Here is one explanation.. NASA’s explanation of the giant UFOs around the Sun: equipment failure
(Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman, NASA STEREO Project Scientist responded to the images of giant UFOs near the Sun with the following technical explanation (reported January 21, 2010). Dr. Gurman wrote, ìWhat you're seeing is the difference between "beacon mode" (near real-time, heavily compressed, binned ) images and normal playback telemetry images (2048 x 2048 native mode, less heavily but still lossily compressed).
"On January 18, at 21:47 UT, the 'central data recorder' at DSN, that stores all the playback data from all the missions DSN supports, failed. A backup CDR took over, but apparently started working on data from January 10, instead of just the four previous hours, as designed. (The last I heard, the DSN engineers don't understand why, but it certainly sounds like a software issue.) For some reason, DSN is unable to reset a pointer and say, please start processing from this time instead of that time. So we, and all the other missions supported by DSN, are waiting for our playback data from January 18 and all following days. As soon as we get it, and the instrument teams have reformatted the telemetry into scientifically useful formats (that allow, for instance, making SECCHI EUVI data into images), we will post the images and other STEREO browse data in the normal places. And no, I don't know why DSN designed such an inflexible CDR system. I suspect they may modify it after this experience." (Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman, NASA STEREO Project Scientist
So apparently the pictures have not been doctored, it was an equipment malfunction ....
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jan 17, 2011 14:37:22 GMT 9.5
"Three giant spaceships are heading towards Earth. The largest one of them is 240 kilometers wide. Two others are smaller. At present, the objects are beyond the orbit of Pluto. The spaceships were detected by HAARP search system. The system, based in Alaska, was designed to study the phenomenon of northern lights. According to SETI researchers, the objects are nothing but extraterrestrial spaceships. They will be visible in optical telescopes as soon as they reach Mars's orbit. .... The ships will reach Earth in December 2012." english.pravda.ru/science/mysteries/22-12-2010/116314-giant_spaceships-0/
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jan 17, 2011 15:23:29 GMT 9.5
a spaceship with a radius of 240 km would be visible to optical telescopes long before it reaches mars.. xample: www.xs4all.nl/~carlkop/neptmoon.htmlground based telescope discovers 3 new moons around neptune (about 40 km diameter) is there a site where we can read the seti researchers claiming this?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jan 17, 2011 15:55:55 GMT 9.5
>a spaceship with a radius of 240 km would be visible to optical telescopes
Beyond Pluto is indefinitely far.
>is there a site where we can read the seti researchers claiming this?
Have a read through the 500+ comments. There might be more data.
Try the original Russian source - using Google translator
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jan 17, 2011 20:54:55 GMT 9.5
i think its a hoax.. if only for the weird claim theyre not visible to optical telescopes till they reach the orbit of mars.. bs
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jan 18, 2011 5:34:04 GMT 9.5
Quite possibly it is a hoax - particularly as neither HAARP nor SETI are suited to such detection. I found it interesting, however, that it was a second report of enormous space craft. Is there an agenda?
If you are interested in enormous space craft, there are various moons that are quite implausible in the appearance of their surfaces.
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jan 18, 2011 8:39:25 GMT 9.5
Perhaps some1 wants to know how the world responds to such a report.. They will need to make a better hoax if they want to find out.. This 1 is to obvious..
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jan 18, 2011 11:30:17 GMT 9.5
implausible moons?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 22, 2011 7:56:37 GMT 9.5
"Greek authors Aristotle and Plutarch, and Roman authors Apolllonius Rhodius and Ovid all wrote of a group of people called the Proselenes who lived in the central mountainous area of Greece called Arcadia The Proselenes claimed title to this area because their forebears were there "before there was a moon in the heavens." This claim is substantiated by symbols on the wall of the Courtyard of Kalasasaya, near the city of Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, which record that the moon came into orbit around the Earth between 11,500 and 13, 000 years ago, long before recorded history." www.informantnews.com/starshipgamma/lunar/moon2.htmlThere are legends in many parts of the world that refer to a time before the Moon appeared.
|
|
|
Post by Henka on Mar 22, 2011 8:05:42 GMT 9.5
Life would not have developed on this planet as we know it if the moon had not been there to lend it's gravitational effects to create tides in the oceans.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 22, 2011 8:35:25 GMT 9.5
While the Moon is unique in many respects I am not sure that it is the only means for providing tides.
For example, perhaps another gravitational influence was present at some stage.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 23, 2011 10:38:00 GMT 9.5
"Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature. " www.trudeausociety.com/home/Frontpage/2008/09/16/02245.html
|
|
|
Post by paul on Mar 28, 2011 14:16:40 GMT 9.5
As we now know the Moon has erosion on it that looks just like water erosion. www.webpages.ttu.edu/dleverin/outflow_channels/fig_9.jpg This reminds me of Adamski who in the 1950s claimed he observed water and water erosion on the Moon when he was taken there. And of course we now know that water is below the surface of Mars, and may perhaps be so for the Moon - thus providing a potential explanation of mascons. As Henka indicated above the precise placement of the Moon is critical to Earth tides and now that we have prima facie evidence of water on the Moon, we can look at the same issue from the Lunar perspective. The tides induced on the Moon by the Earth would be absolutely immense, so what might a great architect do to reduce the problem? There is an easy answer: ensure that the Moon always shows the same side to the Earth - thus making the tidal effect static. Of course doing that is quite tricky as the axial rotation of the Moon has to exactly match its period of orbit around the Earth. And so it does. Thus the local Great Architect leaves signs of his handiwork. I wonder when he will return
|
|
|
Post by paul on Apr 1, 2011 9:00:59 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by Henka on Apr 1, 2011 22:39:07 GMT 9.5
I'm sure there were little asbestos people living there once.
|
|