|
Post by sammy on Oct 20, 2018 6:29:22 GMT 9.5
Heya all!
About a month ago I made a 3D form of my theory. It got a bit swallowed up by the whole grail stuff, but I also needed some time to reflect on its possible meanings. Since it is 3D I made a video for it, and I made the "tool" out of stuff around the house like a ball my kid found somewhere. Anyway, its short and sweet and I hope you all enjoy the video!
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 20, 2018 7:10:27 GMT 9.5
My computer is not complying well with multiple accounts, and it ended up posting under my sons account. He relinquished control HAHA, but the silly pic wont change now and I have changed all the associated profiles... GRRR @ technology HAHA. For half an hour I have been trying to fix this.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 20, 2018 7:42:24 GMT 9.5
The problem of seeing multiple facets at the same time can be dealt with in various ways. One of the better means is Identification: the faculty that starts to operate on the lowest subplane of the Buddhic plane. "4.7 Initial Identification (experience of another's being). By identification, one can experience what another entity is experiencing. For example Parsifal cries out with the pain of Amfortas. Identification is useful for diagnosis and perhaps to see as another sees. I was quite surprised to see how sharp was the vision of a passing eagle - it could zoom right in. I later read that eagles can change the shape of both the lens and the cornea giving a telescopic view." a406.proboards.com/thread/973/21-steps-enlightenment?page=2By identifying with the event/entity it is possible to experience in many dimensions at once. This experience is one of awareness rather than consciousness.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 20, 2018 11:58:25 GMT 9.5
The problem of seeing multiple facets at the same time can be dealt with in various ways. One of the better means is Identification: the faculty that starts to operate on the lowest subplane of the Buddhic plane. "4.7 Initial Identification (experience of another's being). By identification, one can experience what another entity is experiencing. For example Parsifal cries out with the pain of Amfortas. Identification is useful for diagnosis and perhaps to see as another sees. I was quite surprised to see how sharp was the vision of a passing eagle - it could zoom right in. I later read that eagles can change the shape of both the lens and the cornea giving a telescopic view." a406.proboards.com/thread/973/21-steps-enlightenment?page=2By identifying with the event/entity it is possible to experience in many dimensions at once. This experience is one of awareness rather than consciousness. I agree, this tool has helped me in identifying many things within myself and without, and with more of a clear mind. When im focused enough to be centered that is. If I try to picture the tool image in my mind, uninfluenced with any thought (as much as possible). It resembles a fish eye lens mirror as the best description. I will have to get back to you about the 21 steps. That is quite a load of information.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 21, 2018 2:10:59 GMT 9.5
I decided to do a little research into the possibilities of the "fish eye metallic lens". Perty much instantly found some interesting topics. While reading I was reminded of the importance of fish throughout the Bible.
Copied from a recent study:
Methylmercury is among the most potentially toxic species to which human populations are exposed, both at high levels through poisonings and at lower levels through consumption of fish and other seafood. However, the molecular mechanisms of methylmercury toxicity in humans remain poorly understood. We used synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) to study mercury chemical forms in human brain tissue. Individuals poisoned with high levels of methylmercury species showed elevated cortical selenium with significant proportions of nanoparticulate mercuric selenide plus some inorganic mercury and methylmercury bound to organic sulfur. Individuals with a lifetime of high fish consumption showed much lower levels of mercuric selenide and methylmercury cysteineate. Mercury exposure did not perturb organic selenium levels. These results elucidate a key detoxification pathway in the central nervous system and provide new insights into the appropriate methods for biological monitoring.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 21, 2018 2:14:42 GMT 9.5
Is the mercury somehow interacting with our electrical brain impulses?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 21, 2018 3:13:08 GMT 9.5
Adding more to this. Are humans on the top of the food chain because we are the smartest? Or simply because our brains were able to work with the mercury instead of fight it or submit? This new perspective adds many interesting questions.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 21, 2018 6:35:16 GMT 9.5
> Are humans on the top of the food chain because we are the smartest?
The big problem with the Roswell crash in 1947 was that the craft contained a lot of human body parts.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 21, 2018 13:38:31 GMT 9.5
> Are humans on the top of the food chain because we are the smartest? The big problem with the Roswell crash in 1947 was that the craft contained a lot of human body parts. I didnt know about this part of the report. What are you connecting?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 21, 2018 16:33:18 GMT 9.5
While the US collected technology from Roswell, it also discovered that some of the aliens were not truthful and regarded Earth humans as inferior species to be exploited.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 21, 2018 21:33:35 GMT 9.5
While the US collected technology from Roswell, it also discovered that some of the aliens were not truthful and regarded Earth humans as inferior species to be exploited. How do you think mercury ties into this? Or are you just saying humans arent top of the food chain?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 21, 2018 22:47:38 GMT 9.5
When I reach times of needing a break from my brain, this is the times I practice meditation. Once I have achieved separation it always felt like my head being pulled out of a thick liquid into water. The shape of the liquids container always changed, though the liquid itself did not. It shiny and reflective, usually reflecting swirls of color or my own image, or both. Since the liquid is more dense and heavier then water, along with the metallic reflective nature. It never crossed my mind any further then "oh its like a mercury". When I break meditation, its much the same, putting my head back into the liquid.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 21, 2018 23:18:13 GMT 9.5
I should also add. When I meditate I am trying to cut off any outside influence, earthly or spiritually. To "clear" my mind. This is also another reason I rarely do it. Its more of a last line of defense sort of thing. I dont think its good to cut off spirit for too long even though its just our "thoughts", especially since time is relative.
Anyway to cut off earthly influence as much as possible I get as comfortable as possible and in complete silence.
To cut off my thoughts, its like just moving away from any that approach. Or kind of like apposing magnetic forces, in effect forcing them all back to their "source". Engaging the thought is what gives it "energy".
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 22, 2018 17:11:47 GMT 9.5
>are you just saying humans arent top of the food chain?
In the Sumerian accounts the military occupation force did not like hard work and bred humans as slaves and food. Later the Sumerian gods mated with the human women, because as is typical, the military occupation force was primarily male.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 22, 2018 22:29:24 GMT 9.5
>are you just saying humans arent top of the food chain? In the Sumerian accounts the military occupation force did not like hard work and bred humans as slaves and food. Later the Sumerian gods mated with the human women, because as is typical, the military occupation force was primarily male. Its possible. All creatures communicate through noises, actions, chemical reactions, or some other means. So lets say we werent made by aliens. What might be a reason humans focused on language and understanding? Even cave men were painting on the walls.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 23, 2018 6:48:59 GMT 9.5
>Even cave men were painting on the walls. They managed to do this elegant and semi-abstract depiction far underground using light sources that did not produce soot. At least some cavemen had sophisticated technology and sophisticated arts. This particular painting was done by survivors from the destruction of Atlantis.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 23, 2018 7:05:16 GMT 9.5
>What might be a reason humans focused on language and understanding?
Do you recall any traditional people that maintain that they invented their own language and/or writing?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 23, 2018 7:29:00 GMT 9.5
>What might be a reason humans focused on language and understanding? Do you recall any traditional people that maintain that they invented their own language and/or writing? I would say there at least had of been a few just by the various styles still in use.
You could almost say this about the current Scottish use of the English language... Really that language has become their own.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 23, 2018 7:48:45 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 23, 2018 8:09:36 GMT 9.5
>there at least had of been a few just by the various styles still in use. Genesis 11 And the LORD said: ‘Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is what they begin to do; and now nothing will be withholden from them, which they purpose to do. 7Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.’ >Writing first appeared in the Near East at the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC. Conventional historians are bound by group think. Meanwhile the Sumerian king list is interesting: "One quarter of a million years is assigned to the first eight kings before the Flood and more than 25,000 years for the first two dynasties after the Flood" creation.com/the-antediluvian-patriarchs-and-the-sumerian-king-list"Known for their innovations in language, governance, architecture and more, Sumerians are considered the creators of civilization as modern humans understand it." "The region of Sumer was long thought to have been first inhabited around 4500 BCE. This date has been contested in recent years, however, and it now thought that human activity in the area began much earlier. The first settlers were not Sumerians but a people of unknown origin whom archaeologists have termed the Ubaid people" Thus Sumer, our first recognized civilization, appears fully formed by an unknown people
|
|