|
Post by stewartedwards on May 15, 2022 3:56:08 GMT 9.5
Notice how beautifully regular are the semi-circles. How joyful is that shape and formation? Why/how is it joyful? Who wishes humans not to experience that joy? Why? Thoughts.. 1. I find it joyful, a bit fun even. 2. Why? I can mentally play with it. 3. How by spinning it around its axle. (Big circle). The resulting force(s) can be felt. (Added: big circle counterclockwise, small circle clockwise as pulled around) (added: the arm of the big circle can also be felt spinning horizontally which produces some dramatic forces as it completes 360 degrees.) (added: interestingly it can also be spun from the small circle, I wonder what this actually represents). 4. Who? Other humans who either (1) live in fear and try to control things; (2) Annoyed Farmers; (3) People who may have shot first asked questions later, kidnapped, experimented on, etc, any visiting friends who may have made it; (4) if I am correct that our visiting friends are roughly on the same page nowadays, I doubt them; (5) your elementals etc Paul I dont have a clue. Actually yes I do, just writing that has, I think, made the concept of elementals make sense to me. Must think on that. Wow until this moment, to me, elementals were an abstract concept, but I now get how they can experience through matter, and how some might be able to communicate with them to achieve things. Seems a bit Hollywoody to me though. But it is as interesting feeling. Bardons second book never made any sense to me, perhaps I should include it in my book rotation at some stage. 5. Why? Fear. Of losing control. Status. Power. Money. Interestingly this is a claimed man made one, by the bloke with a stick. Must be the Dexamethasone. Added: notwithstanding the claim by the bloke with a stick re this, and the known effects of Dexamethasone which could easily explain it, I can’t help but think that through the various forces that this could be some sort of power generation system blueprint type plan. But for what purpose?
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 15, 2022 10:44:58 GMT 9.5
>I wonder what this actually represents
Any properly constructed symbol or geometric form is an antenna resonating with energy flows
So rotate the 2D image around its long axis so that its is 3D. Rotate it to be vertical with the big sphere at the top
Now move that antenna over Cornwall. What happens?
> elementals were an abstract concept, but I now get how they can experience through matter, and how some might be able to communicate with them to achieve things
Quite so, although humans are usually better using nature spirits as intermediaries
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 15, 2022 19:07:10 GMT 9.5
>I wonder what this actually represents Any properly constructed symbol or geometric form is an antenna resonating with energy flows So rotate the 2D image around its long axis so that its is 3D. Rotate it to be vertical with the big sphere at the top Now move that antenna over Cornwall. What happens? > elementals were an abstract concept, but I now get how they can experience through matter, and how some might be able to communicate with them to achieve things Quite so, although humans are usually better using nature spirits as intermediaries 1. Cornwall. One part of Cornwall, near the pointy bit at Lands End (but a bit further back inland), seems to be gently vibrating in harmony. From first glance. 2. Nature Spirits, again that is a textbook term to me Paul. Unless you mean whatever I am communicating with when I interact with trees. Which I have assumed to be the tree.
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 15, 2022 19:08:37 GMT 9.5
Foxfires
I understand Fibonacci, but am struggling here. Can you guide me please?
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 15, 2022 20:29:26 GMT 9.5
>Cornwall. One part of Cornwall, near the pointy bit at Lands End (but a bit further back inland)
Quite so, but why is it attracted to there?
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 15, 2022 21:04:48 GMT 9.5
>Cornwall. One part of Cornwall, near the pointy bit at Lands End (but a bit further back inland) Quite so, but why is it attracted to there? Do you think I am psychic or something! I don’t know. To me, remembering I work with ‘energy threads’, it seems to be harmonic. A bit like tuning forks in resonance. But why there? I simply do not know Paul. If I had access to ground survey records, satellite imagery, etc, I could test it against known data. But I don’t. Anything I could guess, would be exactly that, a guess. I mean, I could say that there appears to be a dark underground chamber, to the immediate west of the ‘pendulum’, which has a tunnel going eastwards. Within the chamber appears to be an object, of significant size, that harmonises with the ‘pendulum’. It might be a ufo or some sort of technology. But all that is likely just imagination caused by my brain trying to make sense of it. When you consider the ‘data’ that I feel confident about that is simply what I wrote in my post above. One thing that I have learnt (from remote viewing) is that our brains can easily ‘peacock’ and convince us of things that simply aren’t true, as we try to make sense of what we are feeling. Hence the need to ensure differentiation between base data and naming things. So again why there? There is some sort of harmonic resonance. The why as to that is quite advanced work, that I am way out of practice for.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 16, 2022 7:10:24 GMT 9.5
So what is Cornwall famous for in legend? Do some tests
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 16, 2022 16:15:43 GMT 9.5
So what is Cornwall famous for in legend? Do some tests Ah, you see Paul this is where we differ. 1. Legends have their factual underpinning. I love them, especially if ancient Egyptian in origin. Arthurian local to me as well. Remember I have stuck my metaphorical sword into Dragon Hill whilst standing upon it. Quite an eye opener. But I have no need, nor desire, to test around them. Why? The history matters little to me, what matters is the here and now, and how that impinges the future. 2. Remote viewing, which is essence is what you are asking me to do without being blind to the target, can all too easily produce erroneous results. Our brains and minds do that as they try to make sense of the data. The results are commonly nonsense, within little to nothing to properly act as controls. Your skill level may be different Paul. 3. Idilly nosing about, in the way you suggest, could inadvertently link my mind to someone else’s. And that is not a pleasant place to be. Any remote viewer who has experienced that will likely tell you that it is not a nice place to be. True this could happen with any esoteric work, but reading the thoughts of others, even accidentally, can be somewhat troublesome. It’s one of the reasons that I quit viewing, some years ago (mind you there was a perfect storm of reasons). Heart connections don’t produce the same problems. 4. Remember, you have given me a lot to process in a very short period of time Paul, and that itself has opened new doors for me. I need time to explore that in a sandbox. 5. Remember Paul, that while I have proven natural drive raising myself from a bad childhood, through University and the global professions, I am also aware that a few others (mainly from my wandering around the Masonic and conspiracy worlds a decade plus to two decades ago now) have ‘expectations’ of me. The trouble is that I don’t hold the same aspirations as those who put me on a pedestal or told me that I was ‘The One’. (I vote for Audrey Tatau in Da Vinci Code ). The problems of this planet, in my opinion, can now only be resolved by either (1) resolving money addiction and other related traits. This must come initially from the most wealthy people on this planet (as they control and influence each other and what happens in governments and corporations), or by (2) God (however someone views God) doing his thing again and re-engineering humans onto their next evolutionary step. Given that I doubt (1) will happen, I am happy to pursue (2) in my audit report on death. Though (1) is preferable as it shows self evolution, and could work within a few decades as humanity’s hearts open. So my testing, has to be relevant to the current world, with proper controls to aid accuracy. Sure more esoteric testing can be fun, but I am happy with the level of self growth that I reached some years back now. Further growth is obviously good, but, for various reasons (time, desire, making the most of my final time on this planet with what I have) I am not going to be ploughing forwards like I used to. You have already given me plenty to keep me going Paul. Patience. Please. Sorry if this frustrates you Paul.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 16, 2022 17:04:31 GMT 9.5
Does your mind get in the way of experiments?
Push the 3D vertical image next to some of the legendary sites and see what happens. If it surprises you and/or leads to new lines of thought, then it is not imagination
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 16, 2022 17:51:51 GMT 9.5
Does your mind get in the way of experiments? Push the 3D vertical image next to some of the legendary sites and see what happens. If it surprises you and/or leads to new lines of thought, then it is not imagination Paul I think we might differ on the definition of imagination Your test produced the following…. 1. Great Pyramid. Zilch. Absolutely nothing. 2. Stonehenge. When stationary a gently slight movement of the pendulum. But when activated (spinning horizontally) the stones were electrically connecting to it, a bit like one of those lightning balls. Now this can be controlled tested by (1) rock analysis, (2) PhD scientists taking electrical readings of air, stone and soil, etc. These are meaningful controls over imagination.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 16, 2022 18:00:14 GMT 9.5
I could be wrong but Stonehenge is a long way from Cornwall. What do you know about Cornwall?
Why do you limit the 3D image to being a pendulum? It is not.
Imagine that the 3D image is alive. Ask it what it wants from you?
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 16, 2022 18:17:19 GMT 9.5
I could be wrong but Stonehenge is a long way from Cornwall. What do you know about Cornwall? Why do you limit the 3D image to being a pendulum? It is not. Imagine that the 3D image is alive. Ask it what it wants from you? ok let’s do this in real time. 1. Stonehenge is indeed a long way from Cornwall, but you didn’t specify Cornwall. 2. Cornwall has tin mines. An old gold mine I think as well. Locals tend not to like some tourists and second home ownership. Internet cables come in there from under the sea. They produce good pasties. I don’t have that much of a connection to Cornwall. 3. Pendulum, because when you hold it the way you suggest, that is how it appears to me, in a stationary state, with gentle movements sometimes. 4. When active it spins horizontally in the directions I specified earlier. 5. Mind you that could all simply be my imagination! 6. Ok, I will Imagine the 3D image being alive. 7. « What do you want from me? » 8. The only thing that came to mind was « energy ». 9. My energy? 10. « No, connection to planetary energy » 11. Precisely which planetary energy? 12. « Cornish energy » (that must be pure imagination). 13. Ok, why me? 14. « Because you can make the connection » 15. How? 16. « By plugging yourself in » 17. Which is something I have been trying to do for perhaps two decades as explained in prior posts: clearing this planets energy grid, and trying to get the visiting masters chair in lodges sparkling a little to be seen by those true of heart. I don’t seem to have succeeded with either. 18. The device knocks its metaphorical head against a metaphorical brick wall. Paul, like some humans, it might want things from me that either I am not ready to give or don’t think I am the right person for. Unlike your skill cube, this device just isn’t connecting with me in the way you seem to think it should. Help me out here Paul. What is it? What does it want? I assume you don’t think that the man with a stick produced it. The only ‘meaningful’ thing I have got from it was it spinning at Stonehenge with associated electrical activity.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 16, 2022 19:53:17 GMT 9.5
Visualise a piece of paper with the word Grail, and push the paper towards the device. What happens?
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 16, 2022 20:31:33 GMT 9.5
Visualise a piece of paper with the word Grail, and push the paper towards the device. What happens? Essentially it eats/absorbs it.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 17, 2022 7:22:31 GMT 9.5
A prophecy was written by a John of Cornwall.. (the Merlin Prophecies). Written about 1000 years ago. Maybe something.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 17, 2022 8:35:04 GMT 9.5
Essentially it eats/absorbs it. So we have evidence indicating a close relationship between Grail energy and the device. So for what is the Grail device to be used?
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 17, 2022 16:29:25 GMT 9.5
Essentially it eats/absorbs it. So we have evidence indicating a close relationship between Grail energy and the device. So for what is the Grail device to be used? Paul 1. I really would not take my instinctive response as evidence. Evidence suggests a high quality standard that can be used in a court of law, or scientific ie repeatable by other scientists who follow the experiments. If you have a spectrum with evidence at one end, and sheer guesses at the other, at the very best, a single accurate response could only reasonably go around the middle. Your own instinctive responses may well be of evidential quality Paul, but you are way more experienced than me. Re Grail energies generally, yes (1) I know how to remove the sword from the stone, as we discussed many years ago, and (2) re the fabled physical sword in the stone, I (think that I ) know precisely how to remove it (and how some copies have been bolted); (3) similarly with the fabled grail cup, which I have metaphorically drunk from and (4) again think that I know precisely where the physical legendary one is. (5) I have also instinctively planted my sword into dragons hill. But at no time did I, nor do I, sense Grail energies in this crop circle design. Even by using the design as a gateway I don’t feel it. Hence I really would not take my response here as evidence. 2. The way that I would approach this is to use the crop circle image, and both the stationary and operational device ‘gateway’ to flow through. Give me a moment, life intervenes. A. Crop circle image. All I get is the 3D representation described before. B. Stationary device. As above. C. Operational device, physical working described before. « So what is the Grail device to be used » I simply do not know Paul. It does not connect with anything I comprehend. Not that I am aware of anyway. Maybe Paul, your expectation of me is simply too high. Maybe I am so esoterically busy with other other matters (not least what has happened here very recently), eg swimming the worlds oceans, that I am ‘fully employed esoterically’. Maybe I am so tied up with ensuring that my audit report is accurate, fair, and objective (ie I am looking to the future), than I am with ancient energies? (But to counter that I still feel very connected to some ancient energies, including at least some Grail). A decade ago I was humbled by Grail energies, nowadays I just smile when I stumble across them, as has happened. Quite frankly Paul, I don’t know.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 17, 2022 16:38:19 GMT 9.5
>I really would not take my instinctive response as evidence. My observation was identical to yours Now take the 3D device like a wand - with the cup at the top - and hold it towards Lyonesse. What happens en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyonesse
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 17, 2022 17:06:02 GMT 9.5
>I really would not take my instinctive response as evidence. My observation was identical to yours Now take the 3D device like a wand - with the cup at the top - and hold it towards Lyonesse. What happens en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyonesseok, real time. Without looking at the link (I do not know Lyonesse). Wow, holding it that way, when operational, is quite energetic. I get images of energy flows, a bit like lightening emanating from the circle. Ok, let’s now look at the link. After reading the first paragraph I am getting firm resistance. On reading on, I have felt a tightening on the left side of my neck. But back to pointing the wand to Lyonesse. It does seem to be focused at a specific point underwater (which with ocean floor maps I might be able to pinpoint, then again that is only a might). Gold in colour (bearing in mind réfraction of sea water etc), just a small (from my perspective) nodule poking out of the seabed. Let’s get closer. Moving to directly in front of nodule (without wand, but yes that definitely connects to this, almost magnetic like attraction). Wider than my shoulders, and higher than my head if I lie flat. Seems to have markings, perhaps eroded/detritus covered, face like. Let’s delve into the seabed. Loose detritus soon followed by hard seabed. While at an angle of perhaps 15-20% from the vertical, to the right as I look at it. There is a distinct form to it. My mind wants to say statue, but that is probably aol (analytical overlay, where your mind erroneously tries to make sense). At the base seems to be a cube/rectangular object, that appears to have a door of sorts (door is probably aol). Let’s enter the door. It’s solid but gravel like. Let’s go deeper vertically down, no I have to go angled as noted above. Seems to be a cave like chamber. As I am sure my mind is aol’ing I will stop.
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on May 17, 2022 17:07:46 GMT 9.5
Can’t help but feel that a physical ‘wand’ of this type exists there
|
|