|
|
Post by paul on Aug 7, 2010 18:01:00 GMT 9.5
Yeah, if he was a cometary fragment, I'm sure he could create Tsunamis.  I think the difficulty is finding a source of water sufficient to cover mountains for many days. |
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 7, 2010 18:04:04 GMT 9.5
if our solar system moves to a place where the galactic field (no idea how strong that is) is the other way round, how would that affect the sun? If we consider the Cosmos as a conscious and biological entity (like Gaia) your question may need to be reframed. |
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Aug 7, 2010 22:45:58 GMT 9.5
how so?
|
|
|
|
Post by coach on Aug 7, 2010 22:48:15 GMT 9.5
Yeah, if he was a cometary fragment, I'm sure he could create Tsunamis. I think the difficulty is finding a source of water sufficient to cover mountains for many days. Unless the mountains themselves sunk into the earth sufficient to cause what water to cover them. This would mean that the ocean floors would have to rise sufficiently to displace the water above them toward other parts of the earth that lowered. |
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 9, 2010 12:33:24 GMT 9.5
Or that the amount of water on the surface of the planet is variable - e.g. opening the fountains of the deep (abyss/apsu)
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 9, 2010 12:36:13 GMT 9.5
If we consider the solar system moving to another place in the galaxy, this may in the Gaia/biological context, be like a human right hand moving to left knee. Thus, if the galaxy is Gaia-like, all the solar systems have natural functional relationships with their surroundings |
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Aug 9, 2010 15:45:35 GMT 9.5
the question was what the magnetic fields do, or iow, what those natural functional relationships r..
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 9, 2010 18:10:10 GMT 9.5
Perhaps you would like to develop some hypotheses about the function of magnetic fields in natural functional relationships.
|
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Aug 9, 2010 21:23:27 GMT 9.5
...
what i want to know is what happens if our solarsystem encounters an opposite (as to what it is now) galactic magnetic field..
|
|
|
|
Post by coach on Aug 10, 2010 0:45:36 GMT 9.5
Is there such a thing as a "galactic magnetic field?"
|
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Aug 10, 2010 2:58:11 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 10, 2010 5:47:58 GMT 9.5
So how does that fit into a Gaia-based galaxy?
|
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Aug 10, 2010 9:10:28 GMT 9.5
I'm getting confused... I have this weird picture in my head of the Earth, which was (Gaia based) right handed suddenly becoming left handed and rendered fairly useless in the short term because of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Aug 10, 2010 9:21:57 GMT 9.5
Here is an interesting site... the original work done by a Freemason called Churchward. Features up to date work done by fully accredited academics  www.bibliotecapleyades.net/arqueologia/esp_churchward02.htmThree snippets: Carbon-dating, a system for determining the age of organic material, although painfully inexact, was found by experts to be highly inaccurate (by as much as thousands of years) due to the ratio of stable and radioactive carbon in the atmosphere changing over the last 50,000 years, due to activity in the Earth’s magnetic field, or a jump in cosmic rav flux.
...
Three decades ago, W. Jason Morgan of Princeton presented his Plume theory, whereby 20 stationary hot-spots exist beneath the moving lithosphere, originating from convection at the mantle-core boundary and resulting in volcanoes, steam vents and springs. In 1972 Peter Vogt of the U. of So. California enlarged upon this, speculating that plume discharge runs in cycles, corresponding with increased volcanic activity which in turn hurls volcanic dust particles into the upper atmosphere, changing the climate and affecting the amount of solar radiation we receive, causing magnetic field variations, movement in the lithospheric plates and subsequent earthquakes.
..and for coach and mgc (who will find the diagrams particularly interesting).. An area of "enormous numbers of sunken islands," suggesting a lost continent, was discovered in the west portion of the Indian Ocean close to the shores of Africa by the vessel Vityaz (Knight Errant) which explored for seven months in the Indian Ocean between Asia, Africa and Australia during 1961, as a continuation of the International Geophysical Year. Many areas, which appeared on maps as deep blue spots, contained extensive elevations and individual mountains, as well as great accumulations of ancient animal remains, and prehistoric sharks’ teeth. A few years later Dr. Robert J. Menzies. director of Duke University’s Oceanographic Program, and his colleagues spotted and photographed carved rock columns resting on a muddy plain 6.000 ft. underwater, in the 600-mile-long Milne-Edward Deep, a trench off the coast of Peru. and the not so good news.. Timely issues facing the world today are prefaced in the Churchward book series: his Cosmic Forces refers to the lurch of the pole, which caused the magnetic cataclysms as in 10,900 BC, with resultant diastrophism (crust movement), earthquakes and floods. The pole’s normal oscillation becomes a hazard if it swings 23 1/2 degrees from its mean. This has happened many times in the past. |
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Aug 10, 2010 11:22:21 GMT 9.5
to make a comparison i first need to know what the effects of the magnetic field r..
if we can believe the quotes above, it would have a significant impact on the direction of rotation and alignment of n-s axel?
if u see the galaxy as a family with the stars as parents and planets as children, a matriarch (i suppose in this metaphor that what caused the galaxy to xist or that what is at the core (massive black hole)) must have significant influence..
this is far to general to be of any use..
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 10, 2010 11:29:51 GMT 9.5
>if u see the galaxy as a family with the stars as parents and planets as children
This may be a rather anthropomorphic approach.
Consider if space itself is part of the aliveness.
|
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Aug 10, 2010 11:57:14 GMT 9.5
gaia was the primordial provider (mother), created from chaos, that allowed life to form.. compare that to a galaxy and see what u get..
what does space have to do with it btw?
is the scale of the image relevant?
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 10, 2010 12:13:54 GMT 9.5
>what does space have to do with it btw?
If space is part of the aliveness, that will move our focus off solid objects and their interactions.
|
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Aug 10, 2010 12:25:42 GMT 9.5
space keeps soldid objects from being in a singularity..
can u finish the metaphor?
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Aug 10, 2010 13:00:41 GMT 9.5
>can u finish the metaphor?
It is not a metaphor. Space is alive
|
|
