|
|
Post by paul on Sept 3, 2012 12:40:40 GMT 9.5
I was told yesterday of woman I know who is about 50 and is having great difficulty coping with the empty nest. When I had a remote look at her I could see the mechanism. She has managed to give away large amounts of her etheric and astral substance to her children so that she appears quite empty around the solar plexus area. As is usual, much of the donated substance is attached to the outer surface of the adult children's auras and is of no use to them. Thus the woman feels incomplete without the offspring while they wish to get on with their lives. This sort of donation of substance is commonplace in our turns of phrase: - I gave him my heart - Leaving him tore me in two - I would give my right hand to be with him - When I left, part of me died - I don't feel complete There is a most valuable and practical book dealing with these and related situations. www.amazon.com/Spirit-Releasement-Therapy-Technique-Manual/dp/092991516XIn this particular case, I asked the friend who recounted the situation to use the appropriate techniques to assist the woman. |
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 4, 2012 5:39:23 GMT 9.5
The original new price was about $100. It is common that sellers do not adapt to current new prices.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 4, 2012 8:32:19 GMT 9.5
I have a friend who, some years ago, was having a lot of trouble with weakness in her left arm.
After some inner work she asked her arm: to whom do you belong? It replied that it belonged to her husband. After some turmoil the friend decided that she would reclaim her arm. It took a while for her arm to agree but it did.
These days the arm is much stronger and she has fun doing strength exercises.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 4, 2012 14:48:35 GMT 9.5
I found the book to be most valuable - full of techniques that I had not seen before and accounts of actual application.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 5, 2012 8:13:23 GMT 9.5
>there is an expression of old and new school in energy work, old school is like following an empirical formula, and new school was following the heart,
There is also an aspect of patronage. Effective inner techniques are commonly learned under patronage (aura) of some inner planes entity. Continued practice of those techniques may continue to be within that aura.
What if the entity has agenda that are now out of place?
Therefore I am careful not to learn valid techniques from traditions that I do not support. If the techniques cannot be learned under a clean sponsor then it may be better not to learn them.
Some practices derived from martial arts come to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 10, 2012 8:38:03 GMT 9.5
I was observing a case the other day where the woman had an entity attached that was reducing the amount of life force available in her heart. Traditionally the life energy stream anchors in the heart and the consciousness stream in the head.
Generally the two streams are coincident as far as the head then the life stream carries on to the heart. In her case the life stream went behind her head and entered the heart on a distinct angle, with a large dark parasitic entity sitting just at the anchor point.
The entity was approached by a therapist and when I looked later it had became grey rather than black and withdrawn.
The life stream then resumed something like its normal alignment, but still slightly misaligned at the head.
There was a cloud of greyness around the woman, however, one of the therapist's cooperative entities stepped in and polarised the greyness and absorbed it leaving the woman's energy system much clearer - at least in my perception - and the slight repulsion of the life stream at her head ceased at the same time
When the space cleared I could see that there was still a dark and somewhat agressive entity attached to the tail bones.
Meanwhile a sphere of golden light descended on the woman's head and then moved down a little. This seems to be the soul body, now able to condition the personality (progressively enlighten).
The dark entity at the tail bones is being progressively crowded by the light of the soul, but it is not clear to me whether some further act of intent may be required to discharge it.
|
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Sept 10, 2012 9:13:48 GMT 9.5
You know, one of my constant prayers is 'to see more clearly'. I guess that is like saying, I want to work with more sure knowledge, and not just with faith, hope and/or charity.
But could I cope with being able to see as some see (Paul and others)? I think I might find a casual walk through a shopping mall quite daunting to say the least. With each gift we gain, it seems the burden become heavier.
Paul and foxfires, how do you cope with your heavy loads?
Do you have to disconnect at some point?
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 10, 2012 9:29:24 GMT 9.5
I would not say that I see particularly clearly, and as for overload, it is like any situation where you see what you are focussed on.
As for development of inner sight, it is a matter of accumulating sub-plane material (veiled by Jacob's Ladder) and learning to use that material for sense organs.
Decades of accumulative practice are in order, and it helps to have some entity or sponsor share its light body substance with you. An example is guided group visualisation where it is common to see much more clearly than usual.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 10, 2012 13:35:18 GMT 9.5
>often people desire to be miserable and make others feel their emotions, and drag people down there,
I do not have much to do with people who want to be miserable. As for dragging down, that can only occur (afaik) when the target has some of the same sub-plane substance as that on which the source person is practising misery.
Thus, without substance that can resonate with misery, little contagion is possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Sept 10, 2012 14:09:42 GMT 9.5
Where does compassion fit in with all this?
And empathy?
How can you look into some eyes and not feel their pain?
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 10, 2012 14:40:55 GMT 9.5
It is common that a young child with throw a tantrum that the parents observe without being drawn into the emotions of the scene.
Thus the parent sees the pain without engaging and may or may not empathise with the child.
That brings to mind a rather competent woman I knew who was married to a probationary disciple on the 1st Ray (Will). She told me that she often had to shout at him to communicate. One time when she was doing this she noticed one of the children becoming upset. She said that she bent down to the child and said: Look into my eyes. Am I angry? The child said: No. So the woman went back to shouting at her husband.
Thus full participation is possible without being emotionally or mentally captured by the event.
|
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Sept 11, 2012 7:54:29 GMT 9.5
I don't know that people want to be miserable, I think it is more likely that they do not know how to be happy. They do not know how to change their situation, or if that is not possible, to make the most of it.
As a Knight of Hope I would feel the need to at least talk to them.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 30, 2012 7:17:09 GMT 9.5
I was speaking to a fellow yesterday. Previously I has suggested to him that he was still hooked by one of his aunts. He did not think that was the case and suggested that instead of aunt I should have said mother nature and that he felt he should be in nature more than he currently was.
It seemed to me that the hook from his aunt was still in place but with this new clue I saw something else. He was missing a large portion of emotional substance from his solar plexus and it seemed to me that he had left it in the bush (wild country) that was over the back fence when he was young. It turns out that he did spend a lot of time in the bush and has never felt properly part of the human race.
I suggested that he tell the bush beings that he needed his substance back. He did not really pay too much attention to that suggestion but I could see that quite quickly most of the hole filled up as the substance returned.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 24, 2013 13:00:03 GMT 9.5
... I think it is more likely that they do not know how to be happy. .... I was speaking to a friend yesterday who, after some decades of having a "yes but" response to suggestions about improved life experience, has now reached the point where she says: Bring it on! The timing is coincident with the build up to the current powerful full moon. Of course there are states of consciousness that precede "Yes but..". One such is "Is that all there is?" And before that there is denial of possibility "This is all there is." So do all have genuine choice in this? Or do some have to wait eons before their opportunity to be whole? |
|
|
|
Post by stepnwolf on May 24, 2013 22:31:20 GMT 9.5
... I think it is more likely that they do not know how to be happy. .... Of course there are states of consciousness that precede "Yes but..". One such is "Is that all there is?" In my years of teaching, the phrase that really set my teeth on edge was a student's "Yes but..." Invariably it meant a student stopped listening after he formulated his own idea. While it meant that a student had thought enough to shape his own idea, it also indicated that he had stopped taking in new information, because he already had a solution. In such situations when the student begins with, "I think that..." I want to interject, "You don't know enough to think yet." It takes patience to listen the idea through and not to respond with "Yes, but..." There are "yes, but's" in all aspects of human endeavor, but they all seem to point to an unwillingness to proceed further. |
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 25, 2013 5:46:19 GMT 9.5
>not to respond with "Yes, but.
I tend to respond something like: That is an interesting idea. How do you think it works when .......?
|
|
|
|
Post by stepnwolf on May 26, 2013 20:00:09 GMT 9.5
Some times a used book is more valuable because of the hand-written notes in the margins. Other than that I couldn't guess. I certainly would like to examine the book before paying that amount. I've gone past the stage where I'll buy a pig in a poke! |
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 28, 2013 7:57:34 GMT 9.5
One of the symptoms I have observed in some people is that they justify their lack of wholeness in various ways. Options are:
- It is God's will
- I can't change
- I can cope as I am and may not cope if I try to change
- I am actually whole, it is others who are deluded in their sense of greater wholeness
- I've already forgotten why I should change
- I like myself as I am.
|
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 28, 2013 8:50:17 GMT 9.5
I was speaking to a friend who has quite a lot of sadness from her situation. I consider her regrets are misplaced.
She came into this incarnation heavily impacted by some dark entities that had kept her in a depleted state for a number of lives - to disable her. She eventually took up with a man she trusted from past lives in the monasteries and before that. He carried moderate disabilities from those times but not orchestrated as hers were.
So they propped each other up for 25 years - each taking tasks that the other was not able to address because of psychological and energetic difficulties. During that time they brought up two pretty good boys and she with some help managed to extricate herself from her state of sponsored disability.
So now she stands one foot in the disabled past and one foot in the flowing future carrying pain from the apparent failures of this life.
To my view however she has done remarkably, unpredictably well to escape a millennium of cultured oppression. The underachievement, pain and depression she has experienced in this life are but symptoms of the recovery process.
She has achieved spiritual freedom against all odds.
|
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 28, 2013 15:35:30 GMT 9.5
The underachievement, pain and depression she has experienced in this life are but symptoms of the recovery process. She has achieved spiritual freedom against all odds. I have seen this and hadn't considered things in this light, so thank you again Paul. |
|
