|
Iapetus
Oct 10, 2010 10:41:52 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 10, 2010 10:41:52 GMT 9.5
Iapetus is a moon of Saturn. The ridge around the centre of the moon is rather disturbing. The triple ridge 10 km high is hard to explain. The best effort is that the moon had rings (like Saturn) and they collapsed into a narrow high triple ridged uniform structure. If we did not know that the image was of a moon I would think it manufacturing artifact.
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 10, 2010 13:06:49 GMT 9.5
Post by Henka on Oct 10, 2010 13:06:49 GMT 9.5
It's really a giant space walnut. ;D
Seriously, it is probably just an artifact of the formation process of the moon.
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 10, 2010 14:16:58 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 10, 2010 14:16:58 GMT 9.5
Seriously, it is probably just an artifact of the formation process of the moon. That is generally accepted - unless it was a practice for the Great Wall of China. The issue is whether the artifact of the formation process is natural or intelligently induced. There are of course other moons that present similarly improbable artifacts
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 10, 2010 14:21:37 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 10, 2010 14:21:37 GMT 9.5
See also the horrible right angle in the top photo - bottom right - that leads to another long straight line lower down.
And how many craters have long straight edges?
Perhaps the meteorites are at fault
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 14, 2010 12:55:48 GMT 9.5
Post by vajranagini on Oct 14, 2010 12:55:48 GMT 9.5
If you think THAT is amazing, what about the curious HEXAGONAL shaped "polar cap" sitting on top of Saturn. They have NO explanation for it; it was spotted years ago by Voyager, and Cassini-Huygens confirmed it is STILL THERE.
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 14, 2010 13:07:01 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 14, 2010 13:07:01 GMT 9.5
There is an hexagonal crater just below the center of the top image.
Hexagons form when liquid basalt cools slowly but I don't see how a meteorite could do that.
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 14, 2010 13:38:35 GMT 9.5
Post by LorrB on Oct 14, 2010 13:38:35 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 17, 2010 15:18:38 GMT 9.5
Post by vajranagini on Oct 17, 2010 15:18:38 GMT 9.5
The most stunning photo I have ever seen was "backlit Saturn" with the Sun just peeking out from behind Saturn. I also have the National Geographic with photos of the rings; it just BLOWS MY MIND when I think about it...actually SEEING closeup photos of Saturn and its exquisite rings! Did you know that unlike the depictions of the archetypal Saturn as 'cold"and "heavy", the planet itself (only slightly smaller than Jupiter, BTW) is actually LIGHT...Saturn is practically SOLID HYDROGEN...if it was a beach ball and Space was an ocean, Saturn would FLOAT. It's a "star seed", all it needs is something to kickstart the FUSION process and you would have a SUN. I wonder if OUR sun started off as a "Saturn"...how much solid hydrogen would be needed to make a star the size of the sun , I wonder?
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 17, 2010 15:19:36 GMT 9.5
Post by vajranagini on Oct 17, 2010 15:19:36 GMT 9.5
It's really a giant space walnut. ;D Seriously, it is probably just an artifact of the formation process of the moon. It DOES look like a giant white cratered walnut, doesn't it!
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 17, 2010 17:11:05 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 17, 2010 17:11:05 GMT 9.5
It DOES look like a giant white cratered walnut, doesn't it! or the Death Star: Actually the Death Star is a bit smaller than Iapetus "Various sources state the first Death Star has a diameter approximately 140 kilometers. There is a broader range of figures for the second Death Star's diameter, ranging from 160 to 900 kilometers." while "Iapetus' diameter is 1436 kilometers"
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 17, 2010 19:32:39 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 17, 2010 19:32:39 GMT 9.5
And since we are into suspicious moons here is a closeup of the the LCROSS impact site on our moon. There are at least a dozen right angles in the photo. Perhaps the meteorites were cubic. And are there several pentagonal shapes? And look at the straight edges on the top of the tallest shapes.
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 18, 2010 4:02:34 GMT 9.5
Post by Henka on Oct 18, 2010 4:02:34 GMT 9.5
And since we are into suspicious moons here is a closeup of the the LCROSS impact site on our moon. There are at least a dozen right angles in the photo. Perhaps the meteorites were cubic. And are there several pentagonal shapes? And look at the straight edges on the top of the tallest shapes. "Tricks of light and shadow." What does this purport to prove? I see you got this image from Hoagland's site. Richard's an interesting guy, but he thinks that masons run NASA and that the moon and Mars missions have some sort of nefarious Masonic undertones.
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 18, 2010 7:41:41 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 18, 2010 7:41:41 GMT 9.5
> "Tricks of light and shadow."
So how many tricks of light and shadow did you count?
Lets separate them into:
- right angles - pentagonal angles - straight ridge lines - concatenations of straight lines - sets of parallel straight lines.
I have revised my estimate of right angles. I can easily get to 30.
In the bottom left of the photo there is something like a pentagon with a square above it and a set of parallel lines to the right of the square.
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 18, 2010 13:17:44 GMT 9.5
Post by vajranagini on Oct 18, 2010 13:17:44 GMT 9.5
I guess the Masons are responsible for that hexagon on Saturn, too!
It made me laugh when I read about the various things that went on with the planetary probes; it was remarkable how they seemed to conflate with the natures of the archetypes associated with each planet. F'r instance, Cassini-Huygens arrived within ONE HOUR of the time estimated for its arrival (Saturn rules discipline, timeliness and order)
The Mars probe gave trouble; the scientists had to FIGHT with it to get it to work properly (Mars rules conflict and rebellion).
As far as I know there were few problems with the Venus and Jupiter probes (Venus rules "getting along with others" and Jupiter is considered the "great benefic") and the Mercury probe kept 'appearing and disappearing", in line with Mercury's rulership of "communication", and its dualistic, capricious nature; they would lose all radio contact with the probe for a while and then contact would be re-established. This happened several times, apparently!
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 18, 2010 13:35:59 GMT 9.5
Post by vajranagini on Oct 18, 2010 13:35:59 GMT 9.5
It DOES look like a giant white cratered walnut, doesn't it! or the Death Star: Actually the Death Star is a bit smaller than Iapetus "Various sources state the first Death Star has a diameter approximately 140 kilometers. There is a broader range of figures for the second Death Star's diameter, ranging from 160 to 900 kilometers." while "Iapetus' diameter is 1436 kilometers" The "Death Moon" doesn't have quite the same 'ring' to it, does it?
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 18, 2010 18:16:36 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 18, 2010 18:16:36 GMT 9.5
> It made me laugh when I read about the various things that went on with the planetary probes
There were lots of problems with the first probes to the Moon - they kept missing orbit or crashing. That was solved with a better understanding of how gravity interacts with rotating objects.
There were several probes lost near to Phobos - at least one under very strange circumstances.
"Another anomaly was also found one of the last transmissions from Phobos 2. It was a photograph of a gigantic cylindrical object - a huge, approximately 20km long, 1.5km diameter cigar-shaped ’mother ship’, that was photographed on the 25th March 1989. hanging or packed next to the Martian moon Phobos by the Soviet unmanned probe Phobos.
After that last frame was radio-transmitted back to Earth, the probe mysteriously disappeared; according to the Russians it was destroyed .. "
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 19, 2010 14:02:53 GMT 9.5
Post by vajranagini on Oct 19, 2010 14:02:53 GMT 9.5
Wow...is the picture available?
Funny,"Phobos" means "TERROR"..as in "PHOBIA". Phobos and Deimos were the attendants of Mars, in Greek mythology. I bet there was 'terror' in that Russian space facility upon seeing that BIG WEIRD "mothership", and then their probe was suddenly DESTROYED only moments later!!
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 19, 2010 15:16:15 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Oct 19, 2010 15:16:15 GMT 9.5
This is the last official picture from the probe with Phobos as the irregular object But I seem to recall some "missing frames" that appeared some years later. This may well be from those frames. While the object is represented as a shadow it seems rather too well defined for that and as I recall that shadow got rapidly larger as if approaching the probe. And then transmission ceased. www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicmars.htm
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 19, 2010 15:22:43 GMT 9.5
Post by LorrB on Oct 19, 2010 15:22:43 GMT 9.5
NASA: Whats there? Mission Control calling Apollo 11...
Apollo11: These "Babies" are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other spacecraft out there, Lined up on the far side of the crater edge! They're on the Moon watching us!
www.syti.net/UFOSightings.html
See what the astronauts have to say about UFO's. Here they speak for themselves.. Major Gordon Cooper Donald Slayton Major Robert White Joseph A. Walker Commander Eugene Cernan Ed White & James McDivitt James Lovell and Frank Borman Neil Armstrong & Edwin Aldrin Maurice Chatelain Scott Carpenter (Astronauts are supposedly the creme-de-la-creme when it comes to intellectual capacity, observational techniques, physical capacities etc.)
|
|
|
Iapetus
Oct 20, 2010 12:27:42 GMT 9.5
Post by vajranagini on Oct 20, 2010 12:27:42 GMT 9.5
Wow, eh?
I had a boyfriend who was THERE when a UFO landed in their SCHOOLYARD. One kid even TOUCHED IT.
This was in Hamilton , Ontario. It was in the mid sixties, 1966, I think. He told me that he and some friends were playing in the schoolyard one summer when a large weird-looking object appeared, floating over the nearby houses perfectly silently and landed some distance away from them on three disk-shaped feet. It was irregular in shape; not a disk, but more like a lot of shapes stuck together, with the three legs underneath.
He figured it was about 30 feet long in total, and it was obviously heavy, because the disk feet sunk into the ground when it landed. I asked him what was it made out of, and he was baffled for an answer; he said "It wasn't metal, it wasn't glass; I can't think of how to describe it; it was like nothing I'd ever seen, before or since".
The kids ran over to look at it, and an "arm" shot out of the underside and drilled into the ground, like it was taking a soil sample or something. One kid got close up to it and touched its surface- and it BURNED his hand. At that they all got scared and ran to their homes to tell their parents, but when they all got back, it was GONE. Only the dents from the feet and the hole drilled in the ground remained.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) were called in (they are the Canadian equivalent of the "FBI"), and the kids were told to "keep it a secret because people could get scared and have heart attacks and die if you talk about it". I know he was telling the truth becaus another friend who is such an amateur expert on UFOs, the military have consulted him, knew ALL ABOUT the story! He was DELIGHTED to hear this "eyewitness account".
|
|