Furry "Degenerates"

[tundrawolf]

There is no shortage, it seems, of human beings, who judge the sexual freedom of anthropomorphic peoples, as "Degenerate"

What is the meaning of this word?

I am having to type this manually, because of the piece of shit interface I am forced to use (in this case. windows)

"Having declined or becoming less than specialized (As in nature, character, structure, or function) from an ancestral or former state"

So, when an anthropomorphic fox-person, who is sexually connected, attempts to sate his desire with a much larger lover, using his anus as a means of satiating himself- is this degeneracy?

The answer is obvious

Yes!

What form of reproduction does this serve? It drains the reproductive semen of his lover, and drains it into a non reproductive system of his own (The exit of his colon.)

By many judgments, this is base behavior, and a cosmic crime- denying living things of creating more life.

How wasteful!

A literal abomination!

The very definition of sodomy!

A human is right to judge these things as base and despicable- what if the sperm of the penetrating partner, was going to cure cancer? Was, going to be the next messiah (Is a new messiah needed? Huh??)

now that that is established, let's examine the human race.

Whenever you, as a male:

Masturabte

Have oral sex

Have anal sex

Emit semen anywhere but in a fully fertile female in her utmost ovulatory receptive timing,

Commits an act of sodomy.

Am I, reverting to older, religious suppositions?

Of course.

If anyone, is going to rightfully (in right relationship.) wield the word "Degenerate"- one must also, not be a degenerate.

I will also say, "Morning emissions" or, "wet dreams", where a human male has an involuntary orgasm in their waking moments or after a dream- is a similar abomination

There is a verse in the Bible, "Do not speak of the speck in your brothers eye, when you have a beam in your own eye."

So, will the wielder of this, murderous word- be worthy of it's very definition?

Or, will one by a hypocrite?

By the very source of their holy book- what does a just God, do with hypocrites?

I am seeking an answer.

In short, the only being wielding the word degenerate- makes themselves a degenerate.

Do not be deceived by supposed "Advanced" and "pure" societies. They would have nothing to do with the human race if they were as pure as they wished for us to believe.

The bipolar boomer think would have you, then, say- so you wish us to fall into depravity?? All sodomize each other until we die of exhaustion?

Well, puritan, if you have sex with your wife, and enjoy it- you are a pervert.

Should we, then, seek to fall to the other extreme?

Should we then, seek to be in church, 14 hours a day, only breaking to farm food?

In the USA such things were once done in "puritan" times.

If there is a just God, who created the capacity to feel pleasure- you are blaspheming this creator, by not embracing the full pleasures of your body.

Or, that capacity for pleasure was designed to force us to evolve.

Both are true and untrue simultaneously.

If a being is worthy to yield the word degenerate- the entirety of nature would be condemned for it.

What would this profit anybody?

Why condemn those for what you yourself desire?

Is that not the very definition of hypocrisy?

The answer is brighter that can be imagined

[tundrawolf]

And, so, what is the end result, What are the "wages", for loose (degenerate) lifestyles?

There are two.

Dilution of enjoyment of sexuality (The birth of the word degeneracy)

Enhancement of the deepness of intimacy

One, requires devotion to self, the other- careless sexual embracement (dilution)

The second, when embraced, creates a powerful being- that intimidates the former. This seems to be the birth of jealousy, of inferior genetic beings. Who's DNA is spread? The one who embraces sexual enjoyment freely, or, the one who stews in jealousy of them? If the latter is empowered, what ramifications does this have in society?

Could this be why humans are struggling with romantic relationships, at least, in the USA today? (Cite: Marriage statistics. Such as divorce. By some metrics, marriage is literal insanity- unless one enjoys misery, given the results. Happy marriages Vs. unhappy/broken marriages. It is difficult to hide from statistics.)

From my memories, this is what birthed the persecution of beings who embrace sexual pleasure.

Is this just?

Which one draws adverse karma?

In society today, where can we find manifestations of the results of this adverse karma?

Does karma ever get tired of punishing living things for the same sins?

Will humans wake up to any infestations of alignment with psyop principles?

Is the pysop necessary?

For what purposes does it exist? (To be adverse to force us to embrace certain positive principles)

[tundrawolf]

I am seeing the issue, from a human perspective. The animal-human hybrids tend to mate freely, when they channel their more animal sides. This can create population booms, and leave many of the females with unwanted children. "Degenerate" is a judgmental human term, and often wielded by a moral hypocrite, which is why it pisses me off.

The solution is easy, and that is one of education and prophylactics/birth control, similar to humans. They can also easily be taught how to harness and channel their humanness in order to take control over their animalness. This helps to make them ordered, responsible, and "Civil"- actually moreso than many humans, as their animalness tends to make their humanness come under better control, whereas a human- may not even be self aware or able to govern themselves (They have no animal bias to use as a bridge to control their humanness)

[tundrawolf]

I am observing some time-lines, where the anthro peoples of Eden (or other realms) gain access to higher technology, namely, weaponry, and they advance, and reproduce, and, pretty much- overrun other societies (Such as surface humans). They become rulers, and have less need to default to their humanity, and in some adverse cases- end up subjugating humans. Several ways can prevent this, culling their numbers (Who determines this? Is it not murder?) or, become equally, or better armed, and, finally, teaching them to rely on their humanness over the animalness (not that their animalness is automatically adverse. As we see with earth canines, their animalness and purity of heart are actually anchors for the human race, not to lose their own humanness! In such cases, animalness, is an anchor for humanness!), and to be responsible with such things.

I am, violently opposed to harming the anthro folk, and would prefer to default to education.

Another improbably, but possible outcome, is if the superior armed Wolven folk, return to Earth and find humans abusing their kind. It would result in a war humans would quickly and regrettably lose. The Wolven lack chill in some cases. Humans would be reduced to, and kept for, food items and little else. A preventable tragedy in my opinion

[tundrawolf]

But, I have to be careful, not to be so "for" them, that I abandon the human race for them. I can see this

[tundrawolf]

I was on my usual furry trip, and browsing the art, and began to see, the "Degeneracy" in some of these lands.

I began to feel prejudiced, disgusted, and angry about it.

However, I realized the emotional cliff I was sliding down, and endeavored to not fall prey so such attitudes. However, I do understand better, how some humans can feel this way.

It is not beneficial, however. Humans would be no better, if they had similar liberties. So, I try not to fall prey to it. I understand, however. Maybe one should make space with more human, hybrid peoples who do not practice such things, and where it is, education and prophylactics be made available, failing this, segregation and forced evolution (Overpopulation will be allowed to starve so they adapt more responsible mating habits, or incorporate non fertile mating habits such as anal, oral sex and homosexuality to help curb such things.)

It seems as if we are in another cycle of abundance and fertility, such things can result in population booms, which are rarely good or end well given enough time