Post by stewartedwards on Apr 1, 2023 15:13:26 GMT 9.5
Thank you Paul. Thoughts….
1. « There is much redundancy ».
If by this you mean:
i. Redundancy in me, as you alluded to in a prior post, then that would imply only me.
ii. Redundancy with others so that, just as I presumably have taken over from someone else (prior to my birth 58 years ago), others are waiting to takeover from me, that that means that I could leave things to the next in line, who may be better positioned than me to make a real difference on the ground.
2. « Perhaps you may like to intend that Earth humans reject dictatorship and choose freedom and right relationship ».
Perhaps.
i. Remember my responsibility is to this planet, not specifically to the human race. Though as the human race are uniquely destructive on this planet, we obviously need focused attention. Human evolution has to happen one way or another, soon. (A generation or two).
ii. As You will be aware our world has been moving towards dictatorship. Populist politics hasn’t helped. Even Britain has been described as increasingly authoritarian by respected global sources. Compassion has long gone here at that level, though I am sure my politicians would disagree. I had long hoped that good old fashioned British human decency would shine through, but sadly not, except perhaps at election time.
iii. It’s easy to say from a western perspective that dictatorships should be rejected, but our world is more than just the West. Increasingly so. Individual nations have the right to organise its affairs as it so wishes, and that is a matter for it and it’s people. I would love to see the West shine a much brighter light, but frankly we can’t even get our house in proper order.
What you are asking Paul, would be most easily achieved, if I were to die today and force a global genetic re-engineering of the human race, as has happened before. But the human race had a not dissimilar chance 2000 years ago and we blew it. If you know a way that I can intend the human race to do as you ask, please tell me. Equally explain why from a global perspective it is the right thing to do (it would for example essentially crush major global players leading to all sorts of potential unintended consequences).
I think that it is better to illuminate the way so that people can get where they need to be safely, in a balanced way. And then we are, given timescales, back to money. Though correctly applied money could (with great difficulty and resistance I give you) soften the addictive ills that compound the problem of hindering human evolution.
iv. « Choose freedom »
I don’t think anyone is going to argue with that. But the edges offer much difficulty based on perspective.
v. « Right relationships »
Can’t argue with you there Paul. As you surely see this has been the focus of my work.
vi. If you think about it Paul, you are asking me to make the whole world like the West. But, in Britain at least, we are and have been for a dozen years now, driving fear into large segments of our population, causing unnecessary ill health, homelessness , hunger in children etc. We are hardly a shining beacon to anything but money for the rich and sod the poor. It’s been sad to watch and live through. My point we need to get our own house in proper order before we even think of anything else. Also from a purely numbers of people angle who is to say that it is right for the minority globally to tell the majority what to do? Is that democracy?
Strength comes from diversity, working together for the common good.
vii. So let’s say that I could illuminate every human on this planet. You must consider the negatives of pushing people too fast too soon. You must also consider the wider picture of our inter kingdom relationships. Which is one reason why, given the resources I would be pushing oceanography so much.
Conclusion
1. As i still see it, the optimal solution is to do as I have explained above and before. This would over a generation or so soften the monetary addiction and pressures from above, while increasing support and opportunity at the bottom. This would enable the human race to have a much better chance of self evolving.
2. If you want me to intend a forced evolution, my position hasn’t changed. Let Father Time and Mother Nature do their thing, then do a swift comprehensive further genetic re-engineering of the human race. It’s less than optimal, but would get the job done, as it has previously. Though not so good for powers that be who likely would face challenges through not being a position to manage the change to their benefit. Option 1 would enable powers that be to, subject to normal electoral considerations, have the ability to maintain power. To me it’s a no brainer.
Finally Paul.
Remember planetary perspective, not solely a human race only perspective, far less just a part of the human race perspective.
Last Edit: Apr 1, 2023 15:22:47 GMT 9.5 by stewartedwards
A Simple Man, who tried and failed to reilluminate this planet.
Slogging Scotsman Ma’at Ankh Re
Who am I trying to kid for I can’t even resolve family darkness. Whoever is next to step up, please do.
Post by stewartedwards on Apr 6, 2023 22:28:18 GMT 9.5
Just wanted to say, Thank You Paul.
I know that you were unsure whether I should open that particular door, but I am glad that I did.
For those who might be scratching their heads, imagine your body containing numerous filo pastry (thin) like energies, all filling your body. Now imagine them harmonising together into one thicker more coordinated energy. A bit like what some 3rd Dans and above (and once me as a mere yellow belt) can manage in Japan Karate Association karate.
To put it bluntly, I am more decisive, and can feel my internal power much more clearly. Just hope that I can now balance it properly, and keep it that way.
From Slogging Scotsman to you all, keep slogging away. It is worth it.
A Simple Man, who tried and failed to reilluminate this planet.
Slogging Scotsman Ma’at Ankh Re
Who am I trying to kid for I can’t even resolve family darkness. Whoever is next to step up, please do.