Post by seekinglight on Jun 11, 2017 23:46:32 GMT 9.5
Wanted to share my views on a breakthrough in morality that I had yesterday.
I have always considered cursing anyone the work of a black magician or sorcerer, but yesterday I pointed a mudra to curse every single plane I saw flying overhead spraying chemtrails.
However there were also 2 people that were just being punks and wanted to fight me yesterday.
The 2 people I did not curse and would consider to do such a thing the work of a black magician.
However in terms of those poisoning the skies, that is a declaration of war and they will pay for it.
Fortunately we do not have chemtrails in Australia. Consider however if the people making the chemtrails are mentally captured/enslaved. Should they be doubly cursed?
There are more natural ways of dealing with chemtrails.
Post by seekinglight on Jun 12, 2017 10:32:30 GMT 9.5
What I take from that is that it is more appropriate to target the source and that those used as pawns are not the evil orchestrators of the operations.
There was also a blood moon in my area for a while yesterday plus the chemtrails so I think that may be responsible for the wild experiences.
I am however fairly intent on finding a method that will make those spraying chemtrails afraid to ever try it again though.
Last Edit: Jun 12, 2017 10:32:50 GMT 9.5 by seekinglight
>intent on finding a method that will make those spraying chemtrails afraid to ever try it again
Imagine if the dark forces behind such practices were from a higher level of existence than your soul. What then?
I have met such entities and one time the meditation group was "whisked out of the way" of an incoming entity by decision of its sponsor.
I only consider anti-darkness activities when I have a high level entity guarding my back. Even then I usually approach by requiring that the entity show me its light. If I have enough authority, and the entity is not artificial, then it will usually show its light thereby altering its manifested character and behaviour.
Sometimes the entity is too fearful of its supervisor so I have to go further up the chain of command.
If the entity is artificial then it has no light and different approaches may be needed.
It also may be worth considering if the chemtrails are regarded as the lesser evil - being a defense against some types of external attack.
>What would be the purpose of chemtrails in terms of an entity or entities defending themselves?
How would you defend the human population against programmed non-ionizing radiation? Fill the atmosphere with ionic (electrically conductive) chemicals?
>The chemtrail people I've always perceived to be the 'bad guys'.
I find categories of good and bad are not particularly useful. This has been long represented by the saying: It is an ill wind that blows no good.
For those that read literally, that saying is to indicate that almost every event has some good effects.
I find more useful the categories of light and dark. As we know there is a constantly moving dynamic of light and dark in a healthy human. Even the process of human breathing is such a light-dark dynamic.
What then does the breathing of the Cosmos look like to Earth humans?
> people were acting like psychopaths.....That day I saw an absurd amount of chemtrails in the air, and there was also a blood moon....So that leads me to believe the chemtrails rather than the blood moon were having an effect.
What if the "absurd amount" was because an attack was expected or underway?
Were people acting like psychopaths as a result of an attack?
Were people more sensitive because of the blood moon?
You can set up simple experiments to test various propositions.
