Your past conduct here is well known. It would be as well to attend to the standards required from posters.
What? No skepticism permitted.
There has not been any personal attack. If with your abysmal record you choose to make extraordinary claims I suggest you should learn to expect and accept civil and rational expressions of doubt.
>not been any personal attack. ......your abysmal record
I see what you mean.
Smithee
Your contributions so far have been an interesting if unintended contribution to the subject of the thread. Perhaps now you might like to contribute some intentional content.
... I have no intention of encoding such pearls to you as it is principally YOU I consider unworthy of them...
So what is it you seek here?
"It is ambition enough to be employed as an under-labourer in clearing the ground a little, and removing some of the rubbish that lies in the way to knowledge."
To be blunt. I have no intention of encoding such pearls to you as it is principally YOU I consider unworthy of them. I say this because I have been taught it is improper to press such inquiries as you are doing.
>Would you then agree that a unicorn has no outer reality?
There are Chinese traditions of emperors using unicorns to determine guilt. Such unicorns must have been smaller than the one attached to the outside of Noah's Ark.
Then I wonder how many types of entity are labelled as unicorns.
There are Chinese traditions of emperors using unicorns to determine guilt. Such unicorns must have been smaller than the one attached to the outside of Noah's Ark.