|
Post by paul on Mar 3, 2020 12:43:19 GMT 9.5
"In April 1997, United States Secretary of Defense William Cohen declared that there are terrorists at work who ..". are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves..."" www.amazon.com.au/Weather-Warfare-Militarys-Mother-Nature/dp/1931882606It seems that weather warfare started long before 1997. In 1964 Khruschev announced that their scientists were on the edge of developing a weapon that if misused could destroy the planet. He denied the announcement a few days later but currently that is considered to relate to the Tesla Howitzer. The technical name is Scalar Potential Interferometer www.cheniere.org/books/part1/teslaweapons.htmwww.youtube.com/watch?v=ASCnmahuiCgHere are some minor side effects of weather engineering Narrow strip of snow across a Kansas plain Uniform ice boulders The important effects can be seen in: - extreme droughts - sequences of steered storms/tornadoes/cyclones - unusual earthquakes - unusual volcanic eruptions Often the trigger looks like an earthquake but is much more abrupt in its commencement and termination. Such occurred at the 9/11 site Here is an genuine earthquake in the same area a few months before Notice the holes punched vertically in the buildings - sometimes leaving an almost free-standing outer wall www.drjudywood.com/wp/Fukushima had the same artificial profile in the quake that triggered the tsunami. As I recall, shortly after that Japan withdrew its demand for the US to give up its major Japanese base.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 15, 2020 6:28:52 GMT 9.5
More signs of weather warfare "For only the second time in recorded history, five tropical cyclones are churning in the Atlantic Ocean at the same time." www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/14/atlantic-bermuda-hurricane-tropical-storm-sallyIf the US (or a small ally?) has suitable technology then the cyclones may unexpectedly change direction away from the US coast or unexpectedly diminish to storm intensity. Equally of course minor cyclones can unexpectedly get much bigger. We had one of those in Queensland Australia, that went from category 1 to category 5 in about 10 minutes. That was 2 weeks after no one would sit with Putin at lunch in Brisbane for the G20. At the same time Sydney had a week of severe storms that were labelled "evil" by at least one commentator. Not having lunch with Putin seems to have cost Australia some billions of dollars of damage and lost production. I suppose it is a matter of honor - but which side has more honor?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Dec 12, 2021 11:55:32 GMT 9.5
"Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear said the collection of tornadoes was the most destructive in the state’s history. ... Mr Beshear said the destruction in Kentucky was “indescribable, unlike anything I’ve ever seen”. thenewdaily.com.au/news/world/2021/12/12/deadly-tornadoes-kentucky/Is this weather warfare to bleed the dragon - reducing US economic and thus military power?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 28, 2022 15:19:24 GMT 9.5
Meanwhile the extensive drought in the US has yet to exceed the historical maximum. Perhaps there is a way to go yet
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 28, 2022 16:10:43 GMT 9.5
Meanwhile the extensive drought in the US has yet to exceed the historical maximum. Perhaps there is a way to go yet Paul, is this the Wall Street chap who ended up in prison, who used cycles to predict? 1. One of the problems that needs to be overcome when using data from the twelfth century is that, to the best of known knowledge (but clay tablet records etc might prove otherwise) no one was keeping accurate, global data/statistics back then. 2. Even if clay tablets etc provided accurate source data, it would likely be location specific, which then leads to potential issues in ensuring you are comparing the same locations. 3. You also need to be confident that the measuring scale is comparable over time. Which from 1159 could be a bit problematic. While his data might be accurate, most people like me who have passed statistics exams, would view such a graph with extreme caution.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 28, 2022 16:34:51 GMT 9.5
> is this the Wall Street chap who ended up in prison, who used cycles to predict? Armstrong using AI detection of patterns to remove human preconceptions >no one was keeping accurate, global data/statistics back then Fortunately there are natural records. Not far from me is a river mouth where sedimentary layers indicate that the white man so far has never seen a dry season, nor a wet season in that part of Australia. Thus 300 years is insufficient to identify the limits of climate variation. We already knew that from ice ages Also if you look closely at the remaining cladding on the top of the Great Pyramid you can see horizontal erosion that looks remarkably like water erosion. That was a lot of water for at least decades. It is unlikely to sand blown erosion as, apart from being too high above ground, sand blasts would take out the ends first - as compared with water lapping against slightly concave surfaces Lots of seashells and layers of salt have been found at the base The OT says the fountains of the deep were opened for the great flood and there is a Greek legend that after the great flood, the water flowed back into the Earth. They even point out where the water went in. The Sphinx has what looks like vertical water erosion - from rain
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 28, 2022 16:47:51 GMT 9.5
> is this the Wall Street chap who ended up in prison, who used cycles to predict? Armstrong using AI detection of patterns to remove human preconceptions >no one was keeping accurate, global data/statistics back then Fortunately there are natural records. Not far from me is a river mouth where sedimentary layers indicate that the white man so far has never seen a dry season, nor a wet season in eastern Australia 1. While I have no experience of AI, I do have education (from MIT or Harvard or similar mooc) in big data, upon which AI tends to be based. Unfortunately big data is notoriously biased depending on the base data used to train, which in turn in directly influenced by human biases. Garbage in = garbage out. 2. Pattern detection is important, I use it myself, but even with AI it is I understand possible to see… A. Patterns that are just random events eg in sigma 3,4, or 5. (Standard deviations away from the mean). B. Edge events incorrectly (stuff that is data sparse). 3. Natural records, yes I suspected that proxy data might have been used. However proxy data, like your sedimentary layers, is unlikely (though not impossible) to be yearly specific going back many centuries. Normally you have to correlate with other data, make assumptions etc. A general trend over time fair enough, but yearly specific data back many centuries defies plausibility to that level of accuracy. In my opinion. It is vitally important to be highly critical of graphs and any statistical data, as it can be far less robust than many believe. Though good data is worth its weight in gold.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2022 16:51:45 GMT 9.5
>Thus 300 years is insufficient to identify the limits of climate variation
Corruption aside, there is not enough humility in man to accept this minute time frame in its context. Even though individuals such as yourself might be able to offer glimpses of the bigger picture, what would it take for sufficient numbers of relevant people to move humanity onto a more balanced and harmonious footing?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 28, 2022 16:58:24 GMT 9.5
> in big data, upon which AI tends to be based On some occasions Armstrong's models have correctly predicted stock market highs, 30 years ahead - to the exact day As you can imagine he is not popular with politicians claiming to manage economies nor with market analysts claiming to predict them. His models track 1000+ global variables looking for patterns and use those for prediction - missing out human intervention Here is the movie about Armstrong www.imdb.com/title/tt4103404/He says that Lloyds checked every detail before insuring against law suits. Apparently the movie was not shown in the USA
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 28, 2022 17:18:57 GMT 9.5
> in big data, upon which AI tends to be based On some occasions Armstrong's models have correctly predicted stock market highs, 30 years ahead - to the exact day As you can imagine he is not popular with politicians claiming to manage economies nor with market analysts claiming to predict them. His models track 1000+ global variables looking for patterns and use those for prediction - missing out human intervention 1. I have no issue with economic cycles Paul, they have been well used. I think that I first studied them at University nearly four decades ago. 2. I too use patterns for predictions. It does work, but it’s not infallible. 3. Human intervention is intrinsic to all models, after all he chose which variables to include. If nothing else he might have missed some important ones he was unaware off. In this weeks Economist there is an article about military outcomes. It notes that models are useful, but they are not exact replicas of real life. You can’t model all variables and what an AI might spot as connections might not be cause/effect etc. Thinking about military outcomes, while it is in terms of a possible nuclear strike, it is good to see the news report that military bods now recognising that China could come out on top. Who could have predicted that! Years ago now. Though not in terms of nukes I give you.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 28, 2022 17:51:56 GMT 9.5
You might like to follow Armstrong for a while. He is very careful to say that his opinions are not worth much. He relies on his AI models with the cycles they have uncovered including the Pi cycle and another that he has not disclosed
There had to be a reason for keeping him in jail for about a decade on contempt of court charges when he did not provide data that he claimed did not exist. Eventually he was just let out.
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 28, 2022 20:29:34 GMT 9.5
> What would it take for sufficient numbers of relevant people to move humanity onto a more balanced and harmonious footing? Fibonacci this is something that I have invested a lot of time thinking about. My thoughts… 1. If you look long term (centuries to millennia), then robust institutions are key. Religions, freemasonry, schools, wise governments etc. Sadly darkness seems to have won the day, (egos, power, money etc) for quicker evolution. 2. In the short term, I really do think that external assistance is required, as explained before. Darkness is simply too well rooted in our societies just now. 3. The funny bit is that it is in the interest of darkness to assist evolution so that it maintains a measure of balanced long term power, as opposed to cycling down for a while. But I doubt darkness would see it that way due to the importance of short term results, desire for power, money addiction, egos etc. While darker forces must know, it must also be a bit scary for them, and easier to maintain the status quo. The childrens film « Monsters Inc » illustrates this well! 4. I don’t think, as pretty much every religion etc expects, that a singular returning saviour could reasonably achieve this. I mean how could you satisfy the requirements of all religions? Rebuilding the third temple for example. Three religions to satisfy their expectations just for one set of religions, far less the others. 5. So if a single figure, in the modern interconnected world would struggle, what could work? We are back to external intervention or robust institutions. 6. There is the remote possibility that a rebalancing of the kingdoms energy structures could have some success, as this could help rebalance the darkness. 7. In everyday real world terms, taking fear out off peoples daily lives could work wonders in terms of individual rebalancing, which cumulatively could help a lot. But that would take a seismic shift of things like work life balance, food bank useage, fuel bills even to be topical today. This could be achieved if the political and billionaire will was there. Which it isn’t at present. (Hence one reason for my £2 trillion ask ) 8. Ultimately it’s about opening hearts. Just now in Britain at least, it seems that breaking hearts is more important, sadly. 9. It is just possible that darkness will burn out. But that is more likely after a world war. Post ww1 and 2, this burn out coincided with a heartfelt desire for a new social contract that leapt humanity forwards and kept darkness at bay for a while. Which given that darkness creates war is quite poetic.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 2, 2022 12:02:54 GMT 9.5
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 1, 2023 19:36:58 GMT 9.5
The above is a solar panel system ruined by one hail storm Test this for natural or directed storm
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 1, 2023 19:45:53 GMT 9.5
Natural bounces away, directed absorbs, from every angle I tried.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 2, 2023 6:35:17 GMT 9.5
That was my assessment
So was the intervention by humans?
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 2, 2023 6:47:22 GMT 9.5
This is tricky as..
1. Unusually for me nowadays I am enjoying a nice glass of rum, neat. 2. When I did this, this morning, I did not really instinctively focus any further. 3. But I did ask the question a little later. 4. My mind went straight to ufo, then I rationalised (I know a bad thing normally in this context) an aeroplane. 5. So let’s try just now, under a bit of alcohol. 6. « So was the intervention by humans? » 7. ‘No.’ 8. « Why » 9. ‘Humans need to learn’ 10. « Learn what » 11. ‘That they can’t mess with nature with no consequences.’ 12. « So how does this aid that? » 13. ‘The spread of damage, and locality should get wise scientific heads thinking. »’ 14. « So who are you? » 15. ‘Your eternal brothers Stewart. Andromeda. » I also sensed the word Regulus on the background. 16. « So what do you want me to do? » 17. ‘Nothing Stewart, you are doing just fine. Those who have held you back however….. » 18. « Ok » 19. « Go easy on them, they are likely to be simply suffering from human failings. » 20. ‘ Well the humans yes.’ 21. « Ok, this isn’t the time, on alcohol. »
Paul, what have you done? A simple picture!
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 2, 2023 9:05:45 GMT 9.5
>A simple picture!
It did not feel right
>Andromeda. » I also sensed the word Regulus
Agreed
|
|
|
Post by stewartedwards on Jul 2, 2023 21:18:12 GMT 9.5
Paul
I have written and not posted this in several different ways. I know you always see my role as somewhat subsidiary.
Please tell me that I don’t have kingship of this planet. My ego must be going out of control.
All
Please place my name next to a mental image of this planet, and report back the first instinctive thing you sense. Be brave don’t worry about being right or wrong or upsetting me.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 3, 2023 5:25:13 GMT 9.5
When I place your name/image next to the planet it goes to the South Pole - where there are various hi-tech cities etc that were snap-frozen when the surface of the planet slipped.
It looks like you were ruler of one of those complexes/cultures when it dominated the planet.
That is not the same as ruling the planet in a spiritual sense.
Still, being posted into the planet, you were expected to provide spiritual leadership to humans at least
|
|