All I am pointing out is that it is subject to the same weaknesses that other areas of knowledge fall foul of - merely because of the human factor.
Humanity is not infallible nor is it magnanimous generally speaking. Scientists can become jealous of others when it comes to their life's work. Which, given the ways some systems work, is understandable.
Let's talk about pharmaceutical companies who have patented genes in our body!
Let's talk about laws that allow this to happen!
Our birth is but a sleep and a forgetting…trailing clouds of glory do we come from God, who is our home -Wordsworth
If the ark was built. In any case the Titanic was built by professionals, so were many other marvels of engineering that are still standing. So were many advances that have made all of lives so much easier, this computer for example.
About 200 000 years ago humanoids suddenly increased brain size by 50%.
There are various points of interest: - how could such a large increase occur so rapidly after millions of years with little change? - given that humans apparently only use 10% of their brain capacity, what was the value of such a large increase? - the new large head was rather too large for the human birth canal resulting in birth being much more life threatening for humans than for other mammals.
This all seems counter-intuitive from an evolutionary perspective.
These explosions seem completely inconsistent the idea of evolution occurring upon this planet. An obvious solution is allowing that cosmic gardeners drop in occasionally to inject new ecosystems. The provision of an oxygen atmosphere is an obvious intervention.
If we take this view then we might need to reconsider the 5 global extinctions.
"A timeline is chosen for genetic change. Genetic material can be taken from one timeline to the other without disruption to either timeline. That's the end goal of the entities' genetic program.”
"In 2016, US biologist J. Craig Venter, PhD, founder of the J. Craig Venter Institute, achieved something extraordinary. He built a new species of bacteria from scratch in the lab: the simplest genetic lifeform known to science, made entirely through chemical synthesis of a custom-made genome. Now, Dr Venter, together with Synthetic Genomics, Inc. in La Jolla, California, has unveiled a new machine that could print these synthetic life-forms on demand by simply feeding in a genomic design and letting the "ink" form the building blocks of life. The invention could see us colonise Mars with synthetic life without ever setting foot on the Red Planet, and Craig Venter and Elon Musk have teamed up to make this happen."
"In January 2017, a separate team of scientists, at The Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, announced that they had successfully produced the first-ever six-letter genetic code and used it to build "semisynthetic" organisms. "This SSO [semisynthetic organism] constitutes a stable form of semisynthetic life, and lays the foundation for efforts to impart life with new forms and functions"
It seems that Earth biology only uses a 4 letter DNA system. A 6 letter system allows a much greater genetic space.
Yet another 2 hominids have been discovered from which modern humans did not evolve and one of them seems to be an initiate - in the tradition of Australian aboriginals.
"Between these two massive eyes, but slightly above and higher is the remains of where the nose began to rise out of the skull, but its positioning is far too high by today’s standards. Noses of recent times begin to rise at an alignment that is close to the centre of our eyes. This being ignores that setting and its nose basically begins where the thick ridge above runs and is about one centimetre higher than all hominid nasal models past or present.
The mandible had its teeth in position with the exception of the two front teeth. There were no jagged remains inside, both cavities were clean and empty. Knowing that tooth avulsion was used as form of initiation in the general area it seems safe to assume this individual was given ceremony."
...width of arm that has to be at least half that of humans of today. So thin is the bone (maximum width of one centimetre) it is hard to imagine how this individual coped if falling, being pushed, in contact with any moving object heavier than a feather or even the recipient of a solid hug. The bone would literally snap!
...Barely a metre apart, the second skeleton and skull is as different in every respect as could possibly be imagined, and then some.
.. the crucial central sagittal suture that invariably runs across the skull is not there, and nor are the other two sutures accounted for. This skull has no sutures whatsoever, and that is unheard of and runs counter to a central tenet of human development."
Does this mean that the humanoid started with a full size head - not needing to cope with an expanding brain? Artificial?
This is extremely interesting and there are many questions coming out of it. Further research might reveal more clues as to the true nature and purpose of these beings.
Distant peaks emerge....clear as day. The hermit's lantern turns to guide the way. Hermit's Way - F. J. Rogers
About 200 000 years ago humanoids suddenly increased brain size by 50%.
There are various points of interest: - how could such a large increase occur so rapidly after millions of years with little change? - given that humans apparently only use 10% of their brain capacity, what was the value of such a large increase? - the new large head was rather too large for the human birth canal resulting in birth being much more life threatening for humans than for other mammals.
This all seems counter-intuitive from an evolutionary perspective.
counter-intuitive? Zika causes babies to be born with small heads. Perhaps Zika was rampant in the human population until a miniature ice age caused all the mosquitoes to die 200,000 years ago. Then in one generation human heads returned to normal size. I have no idea if that is right or even possible, but it seems completely intuitive.