|
Post by fjrogers on Sept 4, 2017 18:03:35 GMT 9.5
I'm not sure that Cayce was always very accurate or reliable in his readings. I believe he was sometimes but one couldn't always be absolutely sure.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 5, 2017 7:58:07 GMT 9.5
Recovering the moral use of the "working tools" is an important step as it allows us to test what is true to what.
For example visualize the black and white square pavement and visualize someone you know well and put them on the pavement. What happens? Try that with Leonardo da Vinci. What is the difference?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 9, 2017 6:28:31 GMT 9.5
>so sense of feeling & knowing dont ring true
There are several propositions there.
Feeling: That can be difficult for humans carrying emotional trauma (e.g. fragmented chakra intelligence) or whose emotional structures have been penetrated by other intelligences (e.g. hypnotic programming)
Knowing: If this is operating above the mental level it is generally pretty good, particularly if in the transpersonal frequencies of the heart. Otherwise it still needs to be examined. For example implanted mental patterns may override common sense. (Common sense operates at 5.5 and not below that frequency. Many humans struggle to operate as high as 5.5)
Ring true: sounds good to me. But does it feel right? Can I see it? Does it smell right?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2017 9:52:56 GMT 9.5
Recovering the lost Secrets
I would like to ask everyone, what they believe the secrets are?
I've spent a few years in deep research to find truth in myself and in texts which still exist today.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Sept 19, 2017 14:48:49 GMT 9.5
The truth about secrets is that what nature conceals is closed off to the ordinary human being. However, the truth unavailable to most people is in fact hidden within all humanity but is not revealed to the conscious mind except to the initiated.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 21, 2017 8:25:44 GMT 9.5
The truth about secrets is that what nature conceals is closed off to the ordinary human being. However, the truth unavailable to most people is in fact hidden within all humanity but is not revealed to the conscious mind except to the initiated. Well said, the constitution of man, the 5 inward wits(senses) they can unfold with experience, sincerity, suffering, will, and love.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 22, 2017 10:00:40 GMT 9.5
>what they believe the secrets are?
The core of the secrets is that the Cosmos is alive. Intelligence is within every material and non-material object. With right relationship with those myriad intelligences many skills may be manifested.
One such skill that is close to the traditions of Freemasonry is the design of buildings that focus higher energies, and the right placement of those in a managed landscape (terrestrial and celestial)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2017 13:01:05 GMT 9.5
Most of the living Science is contained within certain Myths, or at least the effects are - I realize the secrets can be unfolded within. Realization takes a split second, using the information takes longer
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Sept 23, 2017 16:14:11 GMT 9.5
The truth about secrets is that what nature conceals is closed off to the ordinary human being. However, the truth unavailable to most people is in fact hidden within all humanity but is not revealed to the conscious mind except to the initiated. Well said, the constitution of man, the 5 inward wits(senses) they can unfold with experience, sincerity, suffering, will, and love. It is so important to learn a lot from everything we experience. People who don't learn simply just don't grow spiritually and thus don't move on to higher orders.
|
|
|
Post by pointwithinacircle on Oct 6, 2017 2:24:51 GMT 9.5
Well said, the constitution of man, the 5 inward wits(senses) they can unfold with experience, sincerity, suffering, will, and love. It is so important to learn a lot from everything we experience. People who don't learn simply just don't grow spiritually and thus don't move on to higher orders. It is difficult to know. When I first decided to train myself to be more aware I felt crazy, like I was living in a void. I am still aware of this feeling but I have learned to live with it. I don't know if this is all there is or if I will emerge on the other side of this. I just know I won't go back.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 6, 2017 6:53:29 GMT 9.5
> like I was living in a void
I recall in my early days of inner growth, the presence of God seemed to retreat before my expanding perception
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 6, 2017 6:54:37 GMT 9.5
Recovering the moral use of the "working tools" is an important step as it allows us to test what is true to what. For example visualize the black and white square pavement and visualize someone you know well and put them on the pavement. What happens? Try that with Leonardo da Vinci. What is the difference? This is a pretty easy experiment - that leads to many others.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Oct 7, 2017 14:58:23 GMT 9.5
> like I was living in a void I recall in my early days of inner growth, the presence of God seemed to retreat before my expanding perception I think that this type of experience goes along side inner growth (at least for a period of time). There would be reasons for this.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 17, 2017 6:52:17 GMT 9.5
Reading Psalm 106 in the Jewish translation is interesting:
14 In the desert they gave way to insatiable greed; in the wastelands they put God to the test. 15 He gave them what they wanted but sent meagerness into their souls. 16 In the camp they were jealous of Moshe and Aharon, Adonai’s holy one. 17 The earth opened up and swallowed Datan and closed over Aviram’s allies. 18 A fire blazed out against that group, the flames consumed the wicked. 19 In Horev they fashioned a calf, they worshipped a cast metal image. 20 Thus they exchanged their Glory for the image of an ox that eats grass! 21 They forgot God, who had saved them, who had done great things in Egypt, 22 wonders in the land of Ham, fearsome deeds by the Sea of Suf. 23 Therefore he said that he would destroy them, [and he would have,] had not Moshe his chosen one stood before him in the breach to turn back his destroying fury. 24 Next, they rejected the beautiful land, they didn’t trust his promise; 25 and they complained in their tents, they didn’t obey Adonai. 26 Therefore, raising his hand, he swore to them that he would strike them down in the desert 27 and strike down their descendants among the nations, dispersing them in foreign lands. 28 Now they joined themselves to Ba‘al-P‘or and ate meat sacrificed to dead things. 29 Thus they provoked him to anger with their deeds, so that a plague broke out among them. 30 Then Pinchas stood up and executed judgment; so the plague was checked. 31 That was credited to him as righteousness, through all generations forever. 32 They angered him at the M’rivah Spring, and Moshe suffered on their account; 33 for when they embittered his spirit, [Moshe] spoke up without thinking. 34 They failed to destroy the peoples, as Adonai had ordered them to do, 35 but mingled with the nations and learned to follow their ways. 36 They went on to serve their idols, which became a snare for them. 37 They even sacrificed their sons and their daughters to demons. 38 Yes, they shed innocent blood, the blood of their own sons and daughters, whom they sacrificed to Kena‘an’s false gods, polluting the land with blood. 39 Thus they were defiled by their deeds; they prostituted themselves by their actions, 40 For this Adonai’s fury blazed up against his people, and he detested his heritage.
Good material for another Indiana Jones movie.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 17, 2017 10:57:16 GMT 9.5
> God was very displeased with the census
I think the key was that the god of Israel was allocated very few people by the Most High and was therefore jealous of those gods with lots of humans.
Taking a census was rubbing his nose in his inferiority. Pretty poor politics on the part of David.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 18, 2017 6:17:54 GMT 9.5
Hebrews 7
1For this Melchisedek, king of Salem, priest of God Most High, who did meet Abraham turning back from the smiting of the kings, and did bless him, 2to whom also a tenth of all did Abraham divide, (first, indeed, being interpreted, ‘King of righteousness,’ and then also, King of Salem, which is, King of Peace,) 3without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, and being made like to the Son of God, doth remain a priest continually.
Thus Melchisedek did not have a father, nor a mother, did not have ancestors, neither was born nor died.
From this we can deduce that Melchisedek was not an Earth human.
The original Egyptian gods also did not have a father or mother, being self-generated. This perhaps means that the earliest Egyptian gods came to the Earth so that Earth-based histories did not show their birth, but sometimes showed their deaths.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Oct 18, 2017 16:50:53 GMT 9.5
>Moses perhaps was an Half brother to him / king of Salem But Moses did have parents. Why would St Paul invent such an incredible story: no parents, not born, never died? From what I have read Salem is another form of Shalim - a Canaan god. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shalim
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Oct 29, 2017 13:01:14 GMT 9.5
I remember singing a hymn, in the past, that mentions Salem as a god.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 2, 2017 5:44:34 GMT 9.5
The first 7 pairs of Egyptian gods were said to be self-generated - thus being without father and without mother like Melchisedek.
I rather suspect that they came from outside the planet so that the existence of their ancestors was not known to Earth humans.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 3, 2017 6:28:44 GMT 9.5
>sins from previous life
Or "sins" from a parallel life.
If humans know about parallel processing then it must be a pretty commonplace technique.
|
|