|
Post by mgc on Jul 2, 2010 18:09:31 GMT 9.5
compare the human body to the solar system.. i.e.: the chacras could represent the planets and the skeleton the centrifugal force (through speed and mass) that keeps the planets from plunging into the sun.. what would the brain be? what alignment were we born under? is our evolution linked to to that of the solar system? what happens when our "planets" align?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 2, 2010 19:02:08 GMT 9.5
The planets certainly do correspond to chakras in the body of Adam Kadmon (Heavenly Man) and of course connect into humans through human chakras en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Kadmon
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 6, 2010 9:30:19 GMT 9.5
anything on the questions?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 6, 2010 9:44:53 GMT 9.5
>what would the brain be?
I suggest that the brain is a physical structure while chakras exist in more subtle substance. Hence one might ask which planet focuses mental substance (cosmic-physical gas) in the solar system.
A traditional answer might be Mercury.
>what alignment were we born under?
If "we" refers to humanoids then it is probably too large a category for that question. If "we" is true Masons then the alignment is to the Blazing Star.
>is our evolution linked to to that of the solar system?
Certainly. The human race has a set of natural functions in the Earth (Gaia) and the Earth has a set of natural functions in the Solar System
>what happens when our "planets" align?
The planetary beings (Logoi) are in a perpetual dance combined with a perpetual family tension dynamic that works out cosmic karma. The results generate both constructive and destructive fallout upon the Earth and its life forms
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 6, 2010 10:24:21 GMT 9.5
as it is indd not a chacra, perhaps we shouldnt be looking for a planet.. what about life itself?
if (a.o.) our form is related to the evolution of the solarsystem, it would be interesting to know what it looked like when we evolved from our previous form.. perhaps it can tell us something about where were heading..
what happens when our chacras align?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 6, 2010 10:56:50 GMT 9.5
>interesting to know what it looked like when we evolved from our previous form
I am not sure "evolved" is actually the process. It might be a matter of migration e.g. from another time path.
Arguably we have not yet seen evolution upon the Earth - rather we have seen the unfolding a set of seeds and life forms implanted here - recounted by humans as evolutionary "explosions"
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 6, 2010 21:36:20 GMT 9.5
influenza?
the bigger the creature, the longer it takes for evolution to show..
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 10, 2010 11:12:57 GMT 9.5
evolutionary xplosions occured cause the parameters changed rapidly.. this called for swift adaptation and / or innovation..
what makes u think we migrated from a different timeline?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 10, 2010 12:34:48 GMT 9.5
>what makes u think we migrated from a different timeline?
Are you sure you are living on only one timeline? Perhaps many odd things occur from crossing timelines.
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 10, 2010 21:04:03 GMT 9.5
far as i know there is only 1 timeline, only 1 way to enter and 1 way to leave..
arguably u can enter at any point.. this might lead u to believe there r multiple timelines (i.e. ppl"remembering" things to come)..
u didnt answer the question btw..
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 10, 2010 21:35:21 GMT 9.5
It may be more correct to consider that humans (and most intelligent) entities inhabit multiple timelines of which only one is clearly anchored in this particular physicality.
Resonances between timelines is very common and, for example, energises the various legends about heroes being asleep in sacred hills.
It may also be that humans, not being particularly aware, may cross between timelines becoming confused about small discrepancies, e.g. the house keys are in a different place than where they were left on the previous timeline.
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 11, 2010 12:19:11 GMT 9.5
i see no reason for multiple timelines, nor for (actively) switching between them (on the physical)..
suppose ud go back in time and alter history, would the line diverge and so create another line + universe, or would the alteration simply ripple through the xisting timeline?
if the latter, would it be possible to detect such a ripple as the new history is instantly yours?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 11, 2010 12:23:53 GMT 9.5
>i see no reason for multiple timelines, nor for (actively) switching between them (on the physical)..
Perhaps human reason is not sufficient to determine reality.
>suppose ud go back in time
Going back in time is not the same as changing time paths.
>and alter history, would the line diverge and so create another line + universe,
I suggest that a single universe contains large numbers of time paths just as a human mind may contain multiple thoughts at the same time
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 12, 2010 3:00:49 GMT 9.5
this is not going to convince me that u , another human, have a 100% accurate view on what u deem real..
i see human reasoning failed us here.. i didnt say going back in time is the same as changing time paths.. i asked if the line would split if u went back and changed history or if it wouldnt split but affect the entire line..
what would be the point to multiple time lines if u can already xperience every time?
when i compare multiple thoughts (clusters of neurons firing) to the universe, i arive at multiple self aware races..
is it even possible to have multiple time lines in the same universe? as the evolution of a universe is linked to the events in a timeline, would creating an alternate timeline either create another universe or alter the current universe (without us realizing)?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 12, 2010 8:21:32 GMT 9.5
It may be that speculation is not really going to take us too far forward.
How are you getting on with collecting data? (See post 10). No doubt you can discover other data themes e.g. accounts of human experiences that might be related to multiple time lines.
Perhaps experiments are possible.
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 12, 2010 18:40:05 GMT 9.5
go for the xperiment
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Jul 13, 2010 9:59:29 GMT 9.5
I have become overly (?) occupied with 'the point within the circle' symbol for the past 3 or 4 months. Almost every new (for me) idea I have seems to lend itself to being symbolized by 'the point within the circle'. Take the title of this thread 'as above...' I am assuming that 'so below...' follows. I have been sprouting about as above, so below for years but now I have come to realize that there is no 'above' anywhere. Take the solar system - where is above? Above is a purely personal experience of physical awareness. (We Australians do not live Down Under ;D ) I think that 'as above, so below' could be expressed as 'as inner, so outer' or vice versa. The inner, or the point, can be anywhere. The point can symbolize The All That Is, or me. The circumference call likewise symbolize The All That Is, or me. If I want to know all that is I need to expand my consciousness, Grow into understanding and knowledge - or - concentrate with single mindedness on One Thing at a time. G = Grow, Generate ... just as the points and lines in Geometry Now, I am starting to understand a little more of the significance of The Flower of Life. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seed_of_Life#Seed_of_Life(I had a significant dream once about being encourages to drop the five seeds from a trowel I was holding, I couldn't figure out what the five seeds were symbolizing. Maybe this might be a clue.)
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 13, 2010 10:24:36 GMT 9.5
>I have become overly (?) occupied with 'the point within the circle' symbol for the past 3 or 4 months.
As you probably know the Point within the Circle is a name given to Keter, and Keter sits just above the crown of the human head.
At a TS meeting last night I saw the PwtC above the head of a lady. I pointed it out to her and invited her to connect it to the Pleiades. She immediately had a pleasurable energy connection with some beings from the Pleiades.
Now you will be familiar with my assertion that the plumb line is connected to the Pleiades. And the plumb line is such that once the god of the Israelites had placed it amidst his people he declared that he would no longer overlook their offences. This is presumably because with that plumb line his people were no longer able to err.
|
|
|
Post by mgc on Jul 16, 2010 11:29:02 GMT 9.5
Almost every new (for me) idea I have seems to lend itself to being symbolized by 'the point within the circle'. but now I have come to realize that there is no 'above' anywhere. could "above" be that what is symbolized (mirrored)? could the "inner" be the "above" and what it projects on the "outher" the "below"?
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Jul 16, 2010 16:22:30 GMT 9.5
I had to think there mgc... directional turmoil. Yes.
Geometrically though... patterns (that's for Henka) seem to unfold. One part of the pattern is a mirror image of another but it is the result of an unfoldment, an expansions, a generation..
|
|