|
I/O
Apr 12, 2019 1:56:35 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 12, 2019 1:56:35 GMT 9.5
1/0
You might recognize this grouping of symbols, but lets discuss its dynamic.
The symbols are the number one and zero. Zero for most of our purposes means off, one means on.
Im not sure on the origins of this grouping. It does have some more esoteric purposes.
If we apply it to existence, an existence must be balanced. Zero/off would be balanced but not active.
So to make activity it would be 01, but this is not a balanced existence. Another 1 was created to bring balance (101).
Am I the only one hearing Adam and Eve bells ringing?
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 12, 2019 6:23:08 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 12, 2019 6:23:08 GMT 9.5
When was zero first used by Earth humans?
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 12, 2019 6:38:43 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 12, 2019 6:38:43 GMT 9.5
When was zero first used by Earth humans? I constantly wonder this, as well as how did they describe the interaction into reality (what did they see?).
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 12, 2019 6:46:37 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 12, 2019 6:46:37 GMT 9.5
My best guess how they saw it, would be like a graph with 0 at center. If it was closer to my theories, then possibly a 3D graph with light and dark added for spectrum.
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 12, 2019 8:38:09 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 12, 2019 8:38:09 GMT 9.5
Pythagoras tells us that the numbers are alive. Having spent years building econometric models, I am inclined to agree. I recall several occasions when the numbers themselves were unhappy with equations that maligned (mal-aligned) them.
Does zero have a metaphysical existence? Is it watching us now?
Zero, the metaphysical entity, feels male to me while 1 is neutral and 2 feels softer, female
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 13, 2019 2:51:57 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 13, 2019 2:51:57 GMT 9.5
Pythagoras tells us that the numbers are alive. Having spent years building econometric models, I am inclined to agree. I recall several occasions when the numbers themselves were unhappy with equations that maligned (mal-aligned) them. Does zero have a metaphysical existence? Is it watching us now? Zero, the metaphysical entity, feels male to me while 1 is neutral and 2 feels softer, female
Here are the different things I have considered 0 to be.
God, heaven (complete), balance, the potential for everything, and also nothing (less used for me).
I also agree with your male and female placings.
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 13, 2019 7:13:24 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 13, 2019 7:13:24 GMT 9.5
I forgot also the sun, symbolizing Ra to the Egyptians. This is similar to the God placing tho, but different enough I thought id mention it.
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 13, 2019 8:59:41 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 13, 2019 8:59:41 GMT 9.5
> the sun, symbolizing Ra I wonder if you underestimate the knowledge of the teachers of ancient Egypt. For example they knew it takes over 50000 years for the cycle of oceans tides to repeat - while the Moon may well have only been here for 10000 years. But to be more specific, it may be more accurate to say that Ra is used to symbolize the intelligence behind the Sun - the solar logos. In a similar way humans sometimes identify people by their origin, e.g. calling an Irish immigrant by saying: Hey, Irish! www.light-weaver.com/LW-old/fire/fire1111.html
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 16, 2019 1:56:47 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 16, 2019 1:56:47 GMT 9.5
For me to discover pathways I have to minimalize things incredibly so. A basic connection could lead to new discoveries, but more often then not I will have to leave the pathway the same way I came into it. The more requirements taking me in, will only leave me that much more to work through to get back out. I found the basic connections(core belief) with Egypt and the shape "O", and this is why I share it with everyone. Because I feel it should be checked if we can fill in any of those shapes.
Thank you for bringing more color to this shape Paul!
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 16, 2019 6:28:34 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 16, 2019 6:28:34 GMT 9.5
Why does zero need to be represented by a hollow curved shape?
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 16, 2019 7:55:52 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 16, 2019 7:55:52 GMT 9.5
Why does zero need to be represented by a hollow curved shape? here are the possibilities I have crossed.
its 1 sided, and equal on all sides from any point of view (sphere and not hollow).
All encompassing, in other words nothing is outside of its "circle". The inside has no measure other then its boundaries. Meaning it can grow or shrink depending on necessity.
Also if you get a sunspot it leaves a circle when you close your eyes. Maybe this had some deeper meaning.. *shrug*
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 16, 2019 8:11:52 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 16, 2019 8:11:52 GMT 9.5
Try putting your attention to the metaphysical being that is zero and asking it to show its natural shape
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 16, 2019 23:40:51 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 16, 2019 23:40:51 GMT 9.5
Try putting your attention to the metaphysical being that is zero and asking it to show its natural shape I was coming on here because I had done exactly that HAHA.
It was the cube graph. Only -0+ for measure. Light and dark were the side you see and the side you don't see, kinda like the moon.
The only thing I cant pinpoint, is if its a cube or a sphere. Maybe both? For different things...
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 17, 2019 2:46:40 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 17, 2019 2:46:40 GMT 9.5
I had a consideration that is quickly becoming a strong possibility.
Zero seeks a shape, and we seek that shape for our "home". In other words, we are defining that shape as we speak and that's why I cant pinpoint it. Once we give it shape(with all on the same page), it will give us a home.
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 17, 2019 6:39:58 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 17, 2019 6:39:58 GMT 9.5
The shape that Zero shows me has evolved over a couple of days and now is like OO but originally was just the central vertical line with the two separating upward curves quite short - like a short form of the sign for the constellation Aries
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 17, 2019 7:37:40 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 17, 2019 7:37:40 GMT 9.5
The shape that Zero shows me has evolved over a couple of days and now is like OO but originally was just the central vertical line with the two separating upward curves quite short - like a short form of the sign for the constellation Aries It does change a lot as one progresses. I have had this same image as well. Usually signified to me I am missing something to bring it "full circle". Its kind of saying you have both pieces, you just need to figure out how they come/fit together. This was my own path though, I have yet to make comparisons from others to mine and may differ in some ways.
The two things:
The same but different.
Connected but not together.
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 17, 2019 8:47:33 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 17, 2019 8:47:33 GMT 9.5
>I have had this same image as well.
Nearly identical experiences (of an unusual subject) suggest that there is an external reality being experienced
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 17, 2019 11:15:19 GMT 9.5
via mobile
Post by sammy on Apr 17, 2019 11:15:19 GMT 9.5
This could also be that you are seeing it as it is now, seperated.
If I focus on 0 in it's current social form I see it as split.
I cant help but see things whole or complete. It's in my nature to fix things.
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 17, 2019 13:44:44 GMT 9.5
Post by paul on Apr 17, 2019 13:44:44 GMT 9.5
>If I focus on 0 in it's current social form I see it as split
Is this a cycle of forms? How many forms might there be?
What transcends the cycle?
>It's in my nature to fix things.
I am not sure you have the security clearance to fix this one.
|
|
|
I/O
Apr 17, 2019 23:45:17 GMT 9.5
Post by sammy on Apr 17, 2019 23:45:17 GMT 9.5
>If I focus on 0 in it's current social form I see it as split Is this a cycle of forms? How many forms might there be? What transcends the cycle? >It's in my nature to fix things. I am not sure you have the security clearance to fix this one. Im not sure you are understanding the relationship I am describing with 0 to ourselves. The "shape" is the culmination of the thoughts that lead you there.
At work I do a ton of measurements for the molding machines, if I measure everything right it zero's out to the finish product with .008 tolerance. We have to finish at zero.
"I am not sure you have the security clearance to fix this one."
I tell you whole heartedly, if I didn't I would be in the loony bin or worse.
|
|