|
Post by sammy on May 3, 2019 11:34:29 GMT 9.5
Maybe..
-1 science/grounded/mass +1 religion/spiritual/energy = 0 the balance of Earths conscious awareness.
I'm not saying this is the method. But the equation for the first step to our home.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 3, 2019 16:53:28 GMT 9.5
>because it was not in a straight line it did not go as high as projected.
The rocket went much higher than expected because it was rotating. There are videos on youtube showing the difference in height reached by rotating and non-rotating objects.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 3, 2019 21:39:58 GMT 9.5
>because it was not in a straight line it did not go as high as projected. The rocket went much higher than expected because it was rotating. There are videos on youtube showing the difference in height reached by rotating and non-rotating objects. Yes resistance is cut down, and saves fuel. But this is a completely different compilation of thought because we are discussing resistance on the length of travel now. Fuel = distance - resistance = distance traveled. With your data provided, it would suggest 3/4 of fuel distance was up and 1/4 distance was over (left or right). With the reduced resistance, a good deal of that height distance could be due to fuel efficiency. So would maybe be closer to 1/2 up 1/2 over.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 3, 2019 22:33:32 GMT 9.5
I'm no rocket engineer or mathematician though.. just playing with thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 4, 2019 5:02:24 GMT 9.5
I was thinking about when we form a new realization, or the process anyway.
One thing in conjunction with another thing when compared leaves a question mark in between them. We take this frame work and assign it to this location with the will of our thoughts gravitating toward a centered result. Kind of creating a new "space" to experiment in safety from reality biting you.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 4, 2019 13:52:56 GMT 9.5
I remember a psychology report video that had to do with the shedding of cells.
The issue came to the brain that it (like the rest of the body) sheds the cells containing memory, and yet the memories pass on to the new cells with marginal corruption due to a telephone game effect. They have nowhere to shed off though, and they aren't recycled. The cranium is contained mostly. He explained it like they dissapeared, which he concluded after alot of testing.
If this "safe space" we create when encountering a ?/0 is like a place outside of any other time or space, it would almost be like a worm hole effect. Creating a memory cell imprinted with the blueprints to that thought within that realm.
So essentially I am saying these "blueprint thoughts" float around until another counsciousness catches on to its path. There is instances in history of cutting edge discoveries or inventions happening on the same day in different parts of the world. This might explain that phenomenon.
|
|
|
Post by boreades on May 4, 2019 21:01:01 GMT 9.5
I remember a psychology report video that had to do with the shedding of cells. The issue came to the brain that it (like the rest of the body) sheds the cells containing memory, and yet the memories pass on to the new cells with marginal corruption due to a telephone game effect.
That reminds me - we need to draw a conscious distinction between brain and mind. Even neuropsychologists confuse the two, and most ordinary folk do as well. The mind and memories are not necessarily in the brain.
Why do nearly all people confuse the two?
Most likely because of an obsession with the "physical" reality. As in, if you can't see or touch it, it's not real. What are TV and radio signals then? Are they not real? Or do they only become real when they become tangible, when you hear or see them? But that's a nonsense, the reality existed 100s or 1000s of miles away (at the transmitter) before it was locally real and we perceived it. Some might say it's not real, because it's not visible, it's been transformed into a different format that can't be seen. But that's also a nonsense. The visible spectrum of light only makes up a very narrow band in the whole spectrum of electromagnetic energy and frequencies.
Even more basic is electricity. You can't see or touch it. Even when you get an electric shock, what we're perceiving isn't the electricity, it's the damage to our own cells (the shock) or the ionisation of the air around the spark gap (the spark). But would anyone deny electricity is real? Yet we only perceive the effect of electricity, not the electricity itself.
Back to the brain - what's it for if the mind & memories are somewhere else? I'm tempted by a computing and telecommunications analogy - maybe the brain is more like a router / gateway to a quantum biology or holographic domain?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 4, 2019 22:14:04 GMT 9.5
I remember a psychology report video that had to do with the shedding of cells. The issue came to the brain that it (like the rest of the body) sheds the cells containing memory, and yet the memories pass on to the new cells with marginal corruption due to a telephone game effect.
That reminds me - we need to draw a conscious distinction between brain and mind. Even neuropsychologists confuse the two, and most ordinary folk do as well. The mind and memories are not necessarily in the brain.
Why do nearly all people confuse the two?
Most likely because of an obsession with the "physical" reality. As in, if you can't see or touch it, it's not real. What are TV and radio signals then? Are they not real? Or do they only become real when they become tangible, when you hear or see them? But that's a nonsense, the reality existed 100s or 1000s of miles away (at the transmitter) before it was locally real and we perceived it. Some might say it's not real, because it's not visible, it's been transformed into a different format that can't be seen. But that's also a nonsense. The visible spectrum of light only makes up a very narrow band in the whole spectrum of electromagnetic energy and frequencies.
Even more basic is electricity. You can't see or touch it. Even when you get an electric shock, what we're perceiving isn't the electricity, it's the damage to our own cells (the shock) or the ionisation of the air around the spark gap (the spark). But would anyone deny electricity is real? Yet we only perceive the effect of electricity, not the electricity itself.
Back to the brain - what's it for if the mind & memories are somewhere else? I'm tempted by a computing and telecommunications analogy - maybe the brain is more like a router / gateway to a quantum biology or holographic domain?
HAHA you stole my debate thoughts! Well done! I will try and to see if anything new comes up for me on these thoughts.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 4, 2019 22:39:13 GMT 9.5
So I had a theory that thoughts entering this "safe space" outside space/time are saved on a much larger and inclusive brain. So like our heaven would be like us living in the creators imagination.
This would make sense in that our memories of a moment are not complete. We cant remember all the rocks, trees, animals. Not to mention what we didnt see. We cant imagine a complete existence, but we can remember our place among it.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 4, 2019 22:58:35 GMT 9.5
Was this copy pasted Fox? Or did you write this?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 4, 2019 23:13:16 GMT 9.5
I remember a psychology report video that had to do with the shedding of cells. The issue came to the brain that it (like the rest of the body) sheds the cells containing memory, and yet the memories pass on to the new cells with marginal corruption due to a telephone game effect.
That reminds me - we need to draw a conscious distinction between brain and mind. Even neuropsychologists confuse the two, and most ordinary folk do as well. The mind and memories are not necessarily in the brain.
Why do nearly all people confuse the two?
Most likely because of an obsession with the "physical" reality. As in, if you can't see or touch it, it's not real. What are TV and radio signals then? Are they not real? Or do they only become real when they become tangible, when you hear or see them? But that's a nonsense, the reality existed 100s or 1000s of miles away (at the transmitter) before it was locally real and we perceived it. Some might say it's not real, because it's not visible, it's been transformed into a different format that can't be seen. But that's also a nonsense. The visible spectrum of light only makes up a very narrow band in the whole spectrum of electromagnetic energy and frequencies.
Even more basic is electricity. You can't see or touch it. Even when you get an electric shock, what we're perceiving isn't the electricity, it's the damage to our own cells (the shock) or the ionisation of the air around the spark gap (the spark). But would anyone deny electricity is real? Yet we only perceive the effect of electricity, not the electricity itself.
Back to the brain - what's it for if the mind & memories are somewhere else? I'm tempted by a computing and telecommunications analogy - maybe the brain is more like a router / gateway to a quantum biology or holographic domain?
Seeing is believing... I have had this dilemma for a while on how to overcome that gap. As Foxfires has shown there are ways to build a bridge, but only on a personal level. More like convincing yourself through deduction, which is needed for putting the mirror back together as well. But lets forget all this for a second, and start at 0. Dilemma: Understanding needs to equal reality, enough to believe in full. One of the keys to our mind is truth. It cuts through the crap and hits home. If the foundation for spiritual awareness is based through the truth of reality, it would leave minimal out-skirting during the progression growth. This is why I was saying, -science +religion = 0/balance of conscious awareness Science fact and religious experience will need to explain each other, under one understanding.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 5, 2019 14:38:58 GMT 9.5
point being front end entry seems as if known or assumptions might pre clipse understanding / assumptions Agreed. I was kind of describing this with the source code thread and a few other things.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 7, 2019 1:04:45 GMT 9.5
masculine tend to zen feminine tend to tarry angels are neither masculine or feminine feminine tend to identify problems masculine tend to fix problems angels been told don't cop attitude MORE OR Less so me building an un requested requisition or advise is in opposition to 4 agreements aka how to hook into the drift with minimal damage or wear patterns the sacred cup silver cup is pretty much humans at peace chattering electrical wires on something / equipment / frayed wires connection electric circuits sorta malfunction ./. as not so peaceful / organized
This is why I have been trying to mostly focus on how to explain zero. I cannot define all the paths leading to it, nor will I try to. But no matter what path is taken they all meet at zero/0.
If zero is explained in some kind of finite way. It would then also explain each path leading to it per the individuals perspective.
0 is the answer, the path is the work leading to the question (im not sure if this can make sense until its time to make sense).
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 7, 2019 6:21:13 GMT 9.5
human need stay busy work studied an conic section at trig or cal 1 or 2 level physics 1 & 2? my school answers were neither right or wrong merely what teacher in school wanted 2 hear to apply decent grade & get to next class question for ponder whats 1 over 100 1 over a thousand 1 over hundred thousand 1 over million 1 over billion 1 over trillion I think this is where there is much confusion. "Humans need stay busy work" Why is not all work then being snatched up? I think it should be seen more as "humans need to connect to the next thing". But this is also confusing cause shouldn't the next thing be the same for everyone in that case? Everyone is from a different perspective, so that "next thing" is only depending on what other things came before it. Take example your numbers riddle.. I know there is no right answer, but answers are available (just none are right). So let's say I spent 5 years composing answers to this riddle, and even came up with answers no one else could achieve. I would still be no closer the the right answer then I was the day I started. My brain see's no "next step" to achieve and so my answer would be: "There is no answer", and gain 5 years or even 5 minutes of living my life.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 7, 2019 7:19:10 GMT 9.5
Another way to see this is:
Why did I answer the rocket question, and not this question?
I think however, the best question would be..
Did I answer the question for the sake of my own next step, or for the sake of another's?
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 7, 2019 14:30:42 GMT 9.5
Back to the brain - what's it for if the mind & memories are somewhere else? As we all have noticed, when waking from a dream, the memory usually vanishes very quickly. It seems that this is because the dream is essentially an out-of-body experience and therefore the consciousness is not focused in the brain. Thus upon wakening there is little record in the brain of the events.
I have noticed that sometimes the memory of a dream will reemerge during meditation - when the connection with the brain is greatly reduced.
There may be another factor present. Few humans can control their thoughts and I suspect that some adverse entities like to conceal their influence by suggesting that the physical brain does the thinking. In this way the entities obscure the openness of human thought processes.
I recall a woman that complained to me of possession. She said she would steal money to buy cigarettes for friends and within 5 minutes she would have no memory of having stolen the money. She believed that the possessing entity was editing her brain memory. The entity was using the nicotine to soften up targeted humans. The entity was large and nasty and it took some effort to dislodge it from the community. I had a pain/damage in my left temple for some years after it attacked me.
The brain allows consciousness to be anchored in the physical body so that the spiritual entity may operate in the physical world. Possessing entities like to borrow physical bodies so that they can act in the physical plane
|
|
|
Post by elijah on May 7, 2019 19:01:47 GMT 9.5
boreades said: Back to the brain - what's it for if the mind & memories are somewhere else? >> the brain can be seen as a sort of animal that uses human consciousness and the senses to patchwork code unto matter for creation but certain sensory shocks and other entities (forces) disrupt states of lucidity by control of thoughts or placement of emotional tripwire based on illusory mental pictures <fantasy> ... a lucid dream = im conscious that im conscious <I AM>
paul said: It seems that this is because the dream is essentially an out-of-body experience and therefore the consciousness is not focused in the brain. Thus upon wakening there is little recordin the brain of the events.
>> it seems dreams work on a higher sense when bringing them back to memory i go with intuition more so then re-member-ring...i have at times put myself in places where i dream't of before hand...once i became conscious of bringing the dream into matter a sort of paradigm shift occurs and time feels like it sinks unto itself...when working in reverse bringing time into a lucid dream there is a architect and a design that is as much as i can say...
question for ponder whats 1 over 100 1 over a thousand 1 over hundred thousand 1 over million 1 over billion 1 over trillion
the answer is 0
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 7, 2019 22:35:51 GMT 9.5
Dreams..
This one gets wild for me. I think I have mentioned it before but I will go into better detail.
Until I was in my early 30's i rarely saw my dreams. Seriously only a handful i can recall, but all of them were super lucid. As real, real can get.
It started happening I would become conscious before waking up and seeing the dreams. Once my conscious is aware though I start leaving the dream. I can watch all my dream memories slip away, people and their names, places, things to do or avoid. As the dream memories fade my normal memories start flooding back. I can perceive the entire exchange while it's happening. Once it's done I only have minimal glimpses of the dream and nothing concrete.
It's as though my brain harnesses a different complete alternate universe. A full complete reality. It is still me though, just in a different reality.
This was what brought up my "God mind" reality for heaven. Living in the cosmic imagination.
It was the only thing I could conclude to make sense of it all.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 7, 2019 23:03:39 GMT 9.5
When I was younger I would sleep walk and do things while i was. Even still today if I'm woken up from a deep sleep i will respond, make eye contact, even do things, and have absolutely no memory of it. My wife says its creepy cause mostly I will just give a blank stare until I know I can go back to sleep.
Me, but not me..
Creeps me out too a lil haha!
|
|
|
Post by sammy on May 7, 2019 23:54:41 GMT 9.5
Some of my starting questions about this all..
Is the dream self aware of this reality?
When I get woken up, is my dream self in control?
The way its described it would seem to me my body is more on like a auto drive. I'm not full and vibrant like a normal person, more like just going through the motions.
This would tell me it's the consciousness that completes a bodies life. When it is moving from one body to another (sleeping to awake), it's also like a magnet pushing and pulling memory signatures.
I had thoughts of like a parasite and a host, but it's the will of both. This is where my cosmic imagination theory started taking shape.
|
|