|
Post by paul on Nov 10, 2018 17:32:08 GMT 9.5
"baby Zeus was cared for and protected by a number of divine attendants, including the goat Amaltheia ("Nourishing Goddess"), who fed him with her milk. The suckling future king of the gods had unusual abilities and strength, and in playing with his nursemaid accidentally broke off one of her horns, which then had the divine power to provide unending nourishment, as the foster mother had to the god.[1] In another myth, the cornucopia was created when Heracles (Roman Hercules) wrestled with the river god Achelous and wrenched off one of his horns; " en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornucopia
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 13, 2018 2:52:57 GMT 9.5
"baby Zeus was cared for and protected by a number of divine attendants, including the goat Amaltheia ("Nourishing Goddess"), who fed him with her milk. The suckling future king of the gods had unusual abilities and strength, and in playing with his nursemaid accidentally broke off one of her horns, which then had the divine power to provide unending nourishment, as the foster mother had to the god.[1] In another myth, the cornucopia was created when Heracles (Roman Hercules) wrestled with the river god Achelous and wrenched off one of his horns; " en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CornucopiaIn all of these stories, they describe a piece or pieces broken off with a eternal nature. The pictures show this as a spiral. Perhaps this "broken piece" is the rectangle shape that repeats to make the Fibonacci spiral? They would have most commonly seen it in nature all around them. It could hold quite a meaning for people at the time.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 13, 2018 14:40:15 GMT 9.5
Here we see that the gods have helmets with horns. It seems unlikely that the horns were purely decorative as they would have been quite inconvenient - e.g. snagging branches. Humans, not being privy to the technology, could easily connect the horns with access to the wealth of the gods as was done in WW2 by cargo cults in the Pacific. Here is a different view of the helmet - no snagging, but rather large and still inconvenient This is Lilith. She is an astronaut - hence the wings - and closely associated with owls - hence the feet. The owl association is intriguing. Lilith is supposed to have been the first wife of Adam. She left because he wanted to be on top. She is said to have collected samples from many human males and is currently labelled as a demon. There are of course many accounts of similar activities by highly attractive females encountered during apparent alien abductions.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Nov 13, 2018 14:56:07 GMT 9.5
I've definitely seen Lilith before. The owls might be connected with something nocturnal.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 14, 2018 1:01:22 GMT 9.5
I've definitely seen Lilith before. The owls might be connected with something nocturnal. The owl acts as a power over the nights forest. A clarity in the darkness.
Native and spiritual beliefs call it wisdom in silence. Invoked for one to see the truth. Like clarity in our unknowns(darkness).
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 14, 2018 4:09:17 GMT 9.5
Here we see that the gods have helmets with horns. It seems unlikely that the horns were purely decorative as they would have been quite inconvenient - e.g. snagging branches. Humans, not being privy to the technology, could easily connect the horns with access to the wealth of the gods as was done in WW2 by cargo cults in the Pacific. Here is a different view of the helmet - no snagging, but rather large and still inconvenient This is Lilith. She is an astronaut - hence the wings - and closely associated with owls - hence the feet. The owl association is intriguing. Lilith is supposed to have been the first wife of Adam. She left because he wanted to be on top. She is said to have collected samples from many human males and is currently labelled as a demon. There are of course many accounts of similar activities by highly attractive females encountered during apparent alien abductions.
I can recall my earliest thoughts when observing a horn in my youth. I remember thinking the shape of how it grows, it looks like it could be just the tip of a MASSIVE horn. Imagining how it can grow outward, possibly they saw the horn continuing from where it was cut going into their mind or mental awareness.
Definitely not hunting or jungle travelling attire though. Like today in tribes the outfits are worn during a ceremony, I would imagine much the same back then.
|
|
|
Post by elijah on Nov 14, 2018 9:23:01 GMT 9.5
Here we see that the gods have helmets with horns. It seems unlikely that the horns were purely decorative as they would have been quite inconvenient - e.g. snagging branches. Humans, not being privy to the technology, could easily connect the horns with access to the wealth of the gods as was done in WW2 by cargo cults in the Pacific. Here is a different view of the helmet - no snagging, but rather large and still inconvenient This is Lilith. She is an astronaut - hence the wings - and closely associated with owls - hence the feet. The owl association is intriguing. Lilith is supposed to have been the first wife of Adam. She left because he wanted to be on top. She is said to have collected samples from many human males and is currently labelled as a demon. There are of course many accounts of similar activities by highly attractive females encountered during apparent alien abductions. .. when i put some pieces together it seems not only did the sons of god come unto the daughters of men...but females gods or demons came unto the original man adam kadmon if one looks at it in a kabbalistic sense
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 15, 2018 5:36:43 GMT 9.5
Isaiah 13: An Oracle Concerning Babylon …20 She will never be inhabited or settled from generation to generation; no nomad will pitch his tent there, no shepherd will rest his flock there. 21 But wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures; and owls shall dwell there, and satyrs shall dance there. 22 Hyenas will howl in her fortresses and jackals in her luxurious palaces. Babylon’s time is at hand, and her days will not be prolonged.… satyre. Noun. (plural satyres) (rare or archaic) Alternative spelling of satyr. Satyre dictionary definition | satyre defined www.yourdictionary.com/satyreAbout this result People also ask What do satyrs do? Are satyrs and fauns the same thing? What is a female Satyr? Is Pan a satyr?
Im not sure Lillith fits the bill.
In Greek mythology, a satyr (Greek: σάτυρος satyros, pronounced [sátyros]), also known as a silenos (Greek: σειληνός seilēnos), is a male nature spirit with ears and a tail resembling those of a horse, as well as a permanent, exaggerated erection.
Here is the terminology.
The etymology of the name satyr (Greek: σάτυρος, sátyros) is unclear, and several different etymologies have been proposed for it,[7] including a possible Pre-Greek origin.[8] Some scholars have linked the second part of name to the root of the Greek word θηρίον (thēríon), meaning "wild animal".[7] This proposal may be supported by the fact that Euripides at one point refers to satyrs as theres.[7] Another proposed etymology derives the name from an ancient Peloponnesian word meaning "the full ones", alluding to their permanent state of sexual arousal.[7] Eric Partridge suggested that the name may be related to the root sat-, meaning "to sow", which has also been proposed as the root of the name of the Roman god Saturn.[7] Satyrs are usually indistinguishable from silenoi, whose iconography is virtually identical.[9][10][11] According to Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, the name "satyr" is sometimes derogatorily applied to a "brutish or lustful man".[12] The term satyriasis refers to a medical condition in males characterized by excessive sexual desire.[12][13] It is the male equivalent of nymphomania.
There was a time where there was a distinction from a Satyr to Pan, but only in its youth. That distinction got blurry. I will have to look into Lillith some more.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 15, 2018 12:13:51 GMT 9.5
This apparently was a relief mistaken for Lilith. Here is what Wiki says just to start about Lilith (I got a lot of reading to do from many sources). They do seem similar though, Ereshkigal and Lilith. Possible variations of the same thing. It says Lilith was created at the same time as Adam and represents night. So would Adam represent day? Describing the "divorce" from Adam? Possibly meaning the predators of the night. She left before Eve from the garden also. Maybe meaning the creation of the moon or whatever event that brought this about? So daytime would represent male, and night would represent female. A human design "divorced" from itself.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 15, 2018 12:28:49 GMT 9.5
>They do seem similar though, Ereshkigal and Lilith. Possible variations of the same thing.
I think it is clear that Genesis contains a simplified version of the Sumerian legends. (Abraham was from Sumer). Did the Jewish scribes convert other Sumerian materials to their own religious use?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 15, 2018 23:06:52 GMT 9.5
>They do seem similar though, Ereshkigal and Lilith. Possible variations of the same thing. I think it is clear that Genesis contains a simplified version of the Sumerian legends. (Abraham was from Sumer). Did the Jewish scribes convert other Sumerian materials to their own religious use? It would only stand to reason they got the ideas from somewhere. This would also seem the most likely source.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 16, 2018 7:30:26 GMT 9.5
> they got the ideas from somewhere
There may also be direct experiences of gods recounted in the OT.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 17, 2018 6:10:23 GMT 9.5
"I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
7But ye shall die like men,"
Thus the audience were not men but would die like men. Who were these children of the most High to whom was he speaking?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 22, 2018 6:17:15 GMT 9.5
"I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. 7But ye shall die like men," Thus the audience were not men but would die like men. Who were these children of the most High to whom was he speaking? The spirit that dwells within?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 22, 2018 7:55:25 GMT 9.5
>The spirit that dwells within?
Does the spirit die like men?
|
|
|
Post by elijah on Nov 22, 2018 13:04:46 GMT 9.5
>The spirit that dwells within? Does the spirit die like men? . more like wash rinse repeat .. i read stories of liberating the spirit from certain cycles... is this a conscious choice or the work of something greater?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 28, 2018 5:32:20 GMT 9.5
>The spirit that dwells within? Does the spirit die like men? . more like wash rinse repeat .. i read stories of liberating the spirit from certain cycles... is this a conscious choice or the work of something greater? Sorry for the late response. Been dealing with moving and whatnot.
I would agree with this, but im not positive how this works.
My feeling is that every memory of a life is stored within that spirit. But those memories are privatized to that one life, so they don't "cross contaminate" blurring the line of who is who. In this scenario our "final spirit" would be the accumulation of every life we lived, resulting in a form based off the average of those memories. Something like "Many will become one".
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 28, 2018 5:33:31 GMT 9.5
>The spirit that dwells within? Does the spirit die like men? I feel like this would be what happens if we return to a singularity. Spirit has to be reborn after that event.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Nov 28, 2018 9:32:47 GMT 9.5
>My feeling is that every memory of a life is stored within that spirit.
It may be useful to consider the intelligences attached to chakras. For example the intelligence that learns how to ride a bicycle and learns to swim is not the mind. These intelligences do not usually die and are often passed on in families.
There are also said to exist components that pass from one incarnation to the next so that the refinement acquired, e.g. of the physical body, can be passed on and not have to be relearned in each life. This allows progress to occur, rather than having to start at the beginning each time
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Nov 29, 2018 3:43:45 GMT 9.5
>My feeling is that every memory of a life is stored within that spirit. It may be useful to consider the intelligences attached to chakras. For example the intelligence that learns how to ride a bicycle and learns to swim is not the mind. These intelligences do not usually die and are often passed on in families. There are also said to exist components that pass from one incarnation to the next so that the refinement acquired, e.g. of the physical body, can be passed on and not have to be relearned in each life. This allows progress to occur, rather than having to start at the beginning each time A very good consideration I would say. Good one catching onto this.
I follow many philosophies in life, but one stands before most in day to day life. That is "There is always more to learn". We are aware some people are stronger with mind than body, and vice versa. Basically in essence this scenario would be like strong man VS. smart man and both to the max extremes. In the next life they switch, already having known the one side, they are taught the other. So in the second life it would be no longer VS. but a joining. This would then allow increase in both intelligence fields and needing more "lives" to "learn".
|
|