|
Post by paul on May 28, 2018 7:22:48 GMT 9.5
It was many years ago that I saw him. As I recall he was short, humanoid tending to gnome, with deeply creased skin as occurs in some elderly humans.
I see now that he is looking at me quizzically. He seems to like you and extends a hand - symbolically.
|
|
|
Post by sc on May 28, 2018 18:40:43 GMT 9.5
Thank you I have seen a man as you described much smaller though. I didn't associate it with HPB. What I saw that I still question its relationship to her or more so it's connection with her was red and not humanoid with a bird like face as though its beak was its face and head. I have seen this more that once you could say I've met it followed by an introduction to 3 others though they looked completely different who have no connection to her at all. It still puzzles me to some extent. Overall not a bad experience at all.
|
|
|
Post by paul on May 29, 2018 14:32:14 GMT 9.5
The perception of visual imagery is a joint product of the incoming energy and the receiving system. This means that generated images are strongly influenced by the culture and experience of the recipient.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on May 29, 2018 16:11:32 GMT 9.5
> This means that generated images are strongly influenced by the culture and experience of the recipient.
This is certainly true.
|
|
|
Post by elijah on May 30, 2018 8:49:46 GMT 9.5
> This means that generated images are strongly influenced by the culture and experience of the recipient. also the images may reflect which ancestral dimensions one has certain affinity or ties too in a so called akashic sense
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 27, 2018 6:56:35 GMT 9.5
Most humans cannot control their thoughts. This means that they are wide open to being programmed.
Sometimes overtly spiritual organizations like the TS have members that seem to spend all their time trying to convince (convaincre - to conquer) people that the spiritual does not exist. This forum had one such poster a few years ago. He had a national office in the TS in his country.
These people are quite interesting. They are perfectly clear that existence is material and proud of their resistance to contrary arguments. When you give them an inner experience they then respond that they had that experience only because you suggested that they should. So after a lifetime of proud skepticism their defense is that they are actually very easily subject to suggestion.
My view is that such people are best ignored unless they are useful examples to others.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 27, 2018 12:33:35 GMT 9.5
>seemingly those can be cut down from kinetic energy & possible pulled away from reactionary mode hence revert 2 static or potential energy drive
I have intervened strongly in some cases but in every case the target human or community easily reverted to the usual behavior. These days I generally wait to be targeted for assistance and even then send them away with an exercise to test their determination.
> is there an Freemason term for ones like this
Most Freemasonry is not overtly spiritual - this forum is very unusual. Freemasons mostly aspire to be moral and ethical but there is very little overtly taught about spiritual practices. Accordingly there is no standard term for those that overtly react to spiritual references.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Jul 28, 2018 12:07:05 GMT 9.5
>just dont understand that a 5th dimensional entity would rip em to shreads
The temple is supposed to be protected by the tyler against such entities but his inner work is rarely known
|
|
|
Post by LorrB on Sept 11, 2018 9:33:33 GMT 9.5
Perhaps it is a good thing then that those with 'the knowledge' keep their finger to their lips. Knowledge can and does kill. Be properly prepared and cautious.. One of the first lessons in Freemasonry.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2018 11:51:11 GMT 9.5
Knowledge can and does kill I have noticed this - specifically authors who publish sensitive materials. The opposite is true also Knowledge is meant for a few to use and do good for others.
To inspire the young, give hope, bring miracles. Plant seeds so to speak.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Sept 13, 2018 6:49:30 GMT 9.5
Knowledge can and does kill I have noticed this - specifically authors who publish sensitive materials. The opposite is true also Knowledge is meant for a few to use and do good for others. To inspire the young, give hope, bring miracles. Plant seeds so to speak.
Planting seeds yes, but seeds of knowledge. Which also is saying to help another proceed with confidence (along those lines).
As LorrB stated its one of the first lessons in freemasonry NOT to do so (or hold your tongue).
You might see the conundrum here. Do it, but don't do it. So, what to do?
I have lived in that I keep quiet until someone wants to hear. Wanting to know an answer means they seek a way out of their current status. Knowledge needs to be planted when and where its needed. Otherwise the seeds will be so vast, it would come across more like weeds then truth or knowledge.
We cannot hold our tongues during these moments, they are shining light on the spot that needs to grow, and we must offer the right seeds or they will fall short.
To me, we are all responsible for the growth of humanity. Equally and unequivocally. Holding your tongue at the wrong times, will hold us all back in the journey of life.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2018 10:58:25 GMT 9.5
Do it, but don't do it.
Some men and women who I respect throughout history have done just that. The end result is death or ruin to their lives on earth. This leads me to believe there is a governing body on this planet who screen what is allowed through the net, and what is not.
Do it, but not recognized for it, in greater good.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 15, 2018 12:59:45 GMT 9.5
I once was the facilitator for a discussion group of about 20 - most of whom were not known to me previously. I decided to do it all telepathically.
So from time to time I would decide that a particular person should make a comment about a particular concept in the text being examined. And each time that person would immediately address my targeted concept.
So the discussion lasted well over an hour and I did not say anything to direct the discussion.
It all worked very well and no one seemed to notice that the facilitator was silent.
Can the same be applied to stimulating the unfoldment of knowingness?
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Sept 25, 2018 6:58:57 GMT 9.5
I once was the facilitator for a discussion group of about 20 - most of whom were not known to me previously. I decided to do it all telepathically. So from time to time I would decide that a particular person should make a comment about a particular concept in the text being examined. And each time that person would immediately address my targeted concept. So the discussion lasted well over an hour and I did not say anything to direct the discussion. It all worked very well and no one seemed to notice that the facilitator was silent. Can the same be applied to stimulating the unfoldment of knowingness? I would say this targeted person noticed something out of place. This is a bit different from knowing what goes in its place. The curiosity that drove him to ask questions is the pursuit of knowledge (will to learn). He might learn it on his own after years and years of focus, but it will always be the same knowledge if it was told to him and learned in a day.
I see it like, it will either be fast or slow, but same in result.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Sept 25, 2018 9:42:07 GMT 9.5
>this targeted person
I was unclear in my statement. I chose different people at various times, and each immediately spoke on the particular (different) aspect that I wished him/her to address
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Sept 27, 2018 14:43:14 GMT 9.5
Do it, but don't do it. Some men and women who I respect throughout history have done just that. The end result is death or ruin to their lives on earth. This leads me to believe there is a governing body on this planet who screen what is allowed through the net, and what is not. Do it, but not recognized for it, in greater good. I tend to agree at least 90 % of this belief modality as learned lessons when I use phrase believe such is to indicate experience seems from my vantage point mostly looks such way as I would report to another
For instance Navy seals can seemingly bend reality SO Here is the problem HOW I Speak of an artifact can alter it
Reading of 4th book of mosses clearly indicates humans can cause sin or tragedy defiling earth by image worship
SO humans running around in like fan clubs / followings / or with speech of how great ,., affect reality
im figuring the thingy here is sorta fail safe inside grid rules & most humans just operate in rule sets & maybe the Hebrew priests were like hard wired to feel the ways of access to infinity or prime source & ones wanting in above pay grade / 2 do priestly duties wishing they were called were way to zealous perhaps
Meaning the priests were basically extensions of the will of it Very interesting perspective! I would agree. Possibly blips for advancement or evolution but always defined in some way.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Sept 30, 2018 8:28:58 GMT 9.5
Sammy Atlantis was Said 2 have fallen perhaps by an zealot doing an not so cool or well planned deal pro sey prey tell in earth reality couples in USA not required to tell of spouse misdoings AKA Fan club maybe up to legal or practiced insanity doin stuff they mite regret later & such is called divorce AKA a pain & pleasure unison with similar friends & foes not saying im rite just makes a bunch of sense & karma gets super easy 2 read as such stated Doing something bad enough to make Atlantis fall must have been quite the karmic reaction for sure. Much like Rome I suppose. Your example with couples is a good one. The actions of a person who has chosen to "join" another, will have built in fail safes for what they feel they need to progress further in life. Like you said "misdoings" and those will have an equal and opposite reaction to the other persons emotions. Actions (transmitting energy), emotions (receiving energy). To move in any progressive line it would take the back and forth needed between the two to do so. Its bad though in USA really though. In 2016 out of 2.245 million marriages 827,000 divorced/annulled.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 14, 2018 2:24:42 GMT 9.5
HAHA! Ya the tools for subservience.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Oct 14, 2018 22:44:10 GMT 9.5
Sammy lol Step one subservience Hebrews 10:31 KJV - It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. step 2 Ezekiel 22:30 KJV - And I sought for a man among them, And I sought for a man among them, that should make up the hedge, and stand in the gap before me for the land, that I should not destroy it: main question How many lifetimes till we PROPPERLY know & grow ten foot tall & bullet proof fer the job most say 1000 lifetimes of Playing the book of Job story as a life history till grown enough to sorta operate as an Detente critter & walk away (not get drug into their struggle as they burn wings off angels with a big arsed spy glass) & say im not playin the game u two betting on horses while u fellas get ur bets placed on when the human will flinch Winning the game is u just forkin don't flinch when they take everything from ya & u finally get Guardian angels back & off the u8nemployment line Im not sure i ever fully understood those verses till now. Ya know fox, one day im gonna understand that amazing brain of yours... HAHA š
|
|