|
Post by sammy on Feb 12, 2016 13:24:01 GMT 9.5
Exactly ☺
We've also seen this overgrown plant in fertile soil, probably the most prominent being Hitler. Quite the thorn bush there.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Feb 13, 2016 11:06:46 GMT 9.5
I would say at this point all seeds are some form of hybrid fox. Our main growth of the garden is body, perhaps to be seen like the soil. In either concept it would be seeds growing from/with the main growth. Since our beginning we have acquired MANY seeds. So this would make our earliest seeds trivial or called "survival skills", just considered basic or something like that.
Truly there is lines in the box, and very risky to cross. I think the problem is more some people just don't care LOL.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Feb 13, 2016 13:17:52 GMT 9.5
When bad seeds are planted, what should happen? Can those seeds be transformed into good seeds? What will the harvest be?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 13, 2016 15:17:31 GMT 9.5
I have not seen "bad" cosmic seeds but I dare say the dark lords plant a few of their own. I suspect however that the seeds of the brothers of the dark face are ultimately lesser seeds.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 14, 2016 11:30:44 GMT 9.5
Enlil, the prince of darkness (from a human perspective) wished the coming flood to destroy the human population as it had grown too much and was too noisy. The Council of Gods bound Enki not to warn the humans. Enki, the prince of peace and responsible for the genetic experiments that led to the breeding of humanity, arranged for his favorite human to stand behind a wicker screen. Then Enki, who was unable to warn humanity, explained to the screen what was coming and how to build a boat to save some humans. Thus Enki kept his vow. And the human went and built the ark and saved some of the humans. Later the gods were quite pleased that some humans survived as the humans continued to grow food for the gods. Notice that Enki is here depicted as a snake god. The snake in the Garden of Eden was the one that told the truth to the humans.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Feb 14, 2016 14:39:57 GMT 9.5
>And the human went and built the ark and saved some of the humans.
The human may have been connected with Noah.
> The snake in the Garden of Eden was the one that told the truth to the humans.
The truth serves, lies do not.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 14, 2016 17:08:07 GMT 9.5
>The human may have been connected with Noah.
The Sumerian account is commonly thought to predate the Biblical account. Indeed quite a lot of the Sumerian cosmology appears in Genesis in simplified form.
|
|
|
Post by sammy on Feb 15, 2016 2:56:22 GMT 9.5
LOLFS Think of this like the different single and double slit tests and the act of watching or observing it changes the outcome If its in QUERRY mode of search and find !!! Navy Seals are taught to Look and not see the facts !!! AKA Open the Yellow or Blue Book Window or Vortex !!! And start altering the earth / gameboard I like the comparison, very similar.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Feb 15, 2016 15:09:22 GMT 9.5
I have read an account to the effect that the Sumerians were responsible for what is known as Generic Humanity in the Garden of Eden, thereby creating Adam and Eve through a genetic plan.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 15, 2016 17:11:55 GMT 9.5
Here is Enki in his laboratory - probably with a birth goddess being provided for the first stage in breeding humans. And here is a birth goddess holding a human child, with test tubes nearby and a Tree of Life behind her Earlier efforts were not so good.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Feb 16, 2016 9:46:39 GMT 9.5
The modern IV fertilisation programs might be like a mirror image of what Enki did in his laboratory many thousands of years ago.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Feb 17, 2016 10:04:47 GMT 9.5
There are many things scientists don't know today that were known by ancient civilizations. How did knowledge become lost, and why? True knowledge should be passed on to suitable receivers in every generation. I'm not sure that the Egyptians did this enough, thus certain knowledge and secrets became lost which may have been vital to the evolutionary development of humanity.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 17, 2016 11:44:48 GMT 9.5
> True knowledge should be passed on to suitable receivers in every generation. I'm not sure that the Egyptians did this enough
I rather suspect that the true knowledge was passed on in the temples, mainly to those that had proven their worth and reliability.
That knowledge was protected by vows for which the penalty for breaking was death.
To a rather limited degree Freemasonry is an inheritor of that tradition.
In Freemasonry that knowledge is known as Masonic Science and as the Genuine Secrets. It is rare to find a brother in search of either.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 17, 2016 20:33:51 GMT 9.5
>Humans seem to need to argue and or debate to keep em interested so reality if perfect would seem to have failure to thrive if no one fought with em HENCE The Need for Angels and Demons to war for them over their concepts of good and ebil
Or perhaps the causation is: humans argue and fight because they are egged on by angels and demons e.g. by the Prince of Peace and the Prince of Darkness.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 18, 2016 7:25:21 GMT 9.5
Locally it seems that the Prince of Darkness is Enlil, the second son of and heir to Anu, the heavenly sovereign. Enlil battled with Enki, the creator of mankind and its savior from the flood, the Prince of Peace who was the first born son, by a concubine and therefore not the heir.
Enlil and Enki appear in the Egyptian tradition where we know them as Osiris (Asar) who is killed by his brother Set.
Under both names (Enlil and Asar) we hear of his all-seeing eye.
It is clear to me that the Jewish priests wrote their scriptures to upgrade the status of their self-proclaimed vengeful and jealous god.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 18, 2016 10:27:33 GMT 9.5
Oddly enough Shiva also has an all seeing eye. Is Shiva the same god as Asar, Ashur and Enlil?
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 18, 2016 19:05:17 GMT 9.5
>Perhaps all different ways to say the same thing
Sitchin did a good job of demonstrating that there was/is only one set of gods, known by different names in different places, but identified by relationships and deeds.
As I recall he also demonstrates that when one of the gods leaves the Middle East, at the same time that god shows up in South America.
|
|
|
Post by fjrogers on Feb 19, 2016 13:34:28 GMT 9.5
> As I recall he also demonstrates that when one of the gods leaves the Middle East, at the same time that god shows up in South America.
Some gods were quite transient and became venerated in multiple civilizations.
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 19, 2016 16:34:03 GMT 9.5
>Some gods were quite transient and became venerated in multiple civilizations.
The apparent timing of the departure of a particular god from one area and his arrival in another seemed to me to be good evidence for at least some of the identifications
|
|
|
Post by paul on Feb 19, 2016 16:36:25 GMT 9.5
>So the bible would be the written mainstay to help such with the preaching standards
I rather think that the Old Testament was and is used more to justify theological and military positions. In which case, I become suspicious of origins and dates of particular texts. It is easy to write prophecies after the event.
|
|